WHAT FORMS SHOULD TRANSITIONAL SPECIES TAKE?
The following chapters will be examining those still-living species that,
evolutionists claim, represent transitional links and demonstrating that
these are not transitional links at all, but rather unique, perfect and
flawless living things possessed of all the features of a distinct species.
First, however, it will be useful to consider what any such transitional
links should be like-according to the predictions of the theory of evolution.
Recall how, according to the theory, any transitional link comes into
being. External factors such as radiation and chemical effects cause changes
in the living thing's DNA. The result is mutations that lead to various
physical, anatomical changes in that living organism. According to the
theory of evolution, when a species is repeatedly subjected to mutations
over the course of many generations, it may transform itself into another
species altogether. Again-according to the theory-natural selection selects
the most useful of such mutations, combines them and thus gradually creates
an entirely new biological structure. That is a brief summary of the theory
of evolution's claim regarding the origin of species.
In reality, however, mutations occur at random and generally have detrimental
effects on the living organism in which they occur. When they are not
actually destructive, they have no beneficial effect at all. Not a single
situation in which mutations do any good has yet been identified. For
that reason, it is impossible for mutations to benefit a living species
and improve its chances of breeding and passing along its altered genes.
In particular, it is impossible for mutations to transform a different
living species with new features in incremental stages, starting from
the very simplest, without damaging that living thing's overall structure
or the flawlessness of its functions, and without making its viability
considerably more difficult.
 |
According to the theory of evolution,
species developed from one another by means of minute changes. If
this claim by evolutionists were true, then transitional form creatures
of the kind shown here should have been found. Yet there is not
a trace of them. |
Since mutations are random and unintentional, they cannot construct in
a series of moves a lung to help a fish move from the sea to the land.
Neither can they, either immediately or in gradual stages, turn that creature's
fins into legs to bear its weight on land or let it walk comfortably without
lurching. As a result of mutations, oddly shaped, deformed structures
will emerge-somewhere between gills and lungs, fins and legs, scales and
feathers, feet and wings, a four-legged posture and an upright one, crippled
and with a great many abnormalities..
Moreover, evolutionists hypothesize that this process will last for millions
of years. Therefore, the number of such deformed transitional individuals
will be much greater than the number of completed species, and such in-between
fossils should be those most frequently encountered. According to evolutionists'
claims, every species we see today, and right down to the finest detail,
every structure within those species, from eye sockets to ankles, from
the tiny bones which constitute the fingers to the shape of the skull,
from the shape of the rib cage to the number of vertebra-all came about
gradually as the result of random mutations. This means that every organ,
limb, and component of the species was also formed in stages until the
final form of that species emerged at last.
Consider the skull, for example. All the creatures today and all those
that once lived in the past possess flawless, smooth, symmetrical skulls
with no deformations at all. According to the claims of evolutionists,
however, skulls must have gone through a great many tentative stages until
the first flawless one emerged. Skulls would have to assume a large number
of asymmetrical forms before taking on a symmetrical appearance. Until
they did assume a symmetrical appearance, billions of imperfect forms
would have been preserved-for example, a preponderance toward the right,
the jaw pointing more right or left, the nose being nearer the mouth,
one ear being further back on the skull than the other, one eye socket
being higher and more to the left etc. Alternatively, a number of useless
and unnecessary bones should appear on such skulls, only to vanish a few
generations later, since they serve no purpose. Yet no such skulls appear
in the fossil record. They are all perfect and symmetrical, just like
present-day skulls. The spaces between apertures for such organs as the
eyes, ears and nose are also symmetrical and regular.
As can be seen in the illustrations, all known skulls are fully formed
and regular, displaying no transitional characteristics. No matter which
species they belong to, all have perfect structures, with no appearance
of being half-formed or incomplete. These skulls did not come into existence
by chance mutations or retain features of any transition from one species
to another, just like those of present-day living things. If the theory
of evolution were true, then there should be fossils with the kinds of
lopsided, shapeless and deformed skulls shown on the preceding page. Yet
there is no trace of such fossils in any strata, anywhere in the world.
This definitively disproves the theory of evolution's claims.
 |
DEFECTIVE TRANSITIONAL
FORMS WHICH SHOULD EXIST ACCORDING TO EVOLUTIONISTS, BUT WHICH DO
NOT
(Pictures: 1-4)
ONE OF THE MILLIONS OF COMPLETE FOOT FORMS ENCOUNTERED (picture:
5)
|
For a clearer idea of how many odd structures and peculiar transitional
forms the fossil record should contain, we need to focus on the evolutionist
concept of coincidence. According to the theory, transitional forms come
into existence quite unconsciously, entirely by chance. For instance,
a random mutation affects the genetic structure of a creature, and a number
of changes take place in its body structure. However, this mutation does
not alter the living thing's genetic structure entirely. For instance,
while its hind legs are affected, its skull may remain the same. Whichever
genes the mutation may impact on, there will be a change only in the structure
or organs controlled by those particular genes. This is a piecemeal fantasy
that can never actually come about.
As we know, all the features possessed by living things are concealed
inside their DNA, which is analogous to an enclyclopedic data bank consisting
of billions of units, or letters. Random mutations which affect those
letters cannot make that information more useful because these mutations
are devoid of conscious intent. For that reason, mutations will always
corrupt data, not improve it.
IMAGINARY TRANSITIONAL
FORMS WHICH EVOLUTIONISTS CLAIM MUST EXIST
IMAGINARY TRANSITIONAL FORMS,
LIKE THOSE BELOW, NEVER EXISTED.
|
 |
Evolutionists maintain that living things assumed
their present forms in stages. Yet not a single example of a transitional
form has ever been found.
ABOVE
(6) A PRESENT-DAY DRAGONFLY WITH ITS FLAWLESS STRUCTURE
(7) A DRAGONFLY FOSSIL, SOME 355-295 MILLION YEARS OLD, IS IDENTICAL
TO PRESENT-DAY SPECIMENS.
IN THE MIDDLE
(5) A FOSSIL OF A COMPLETE BIRD
All of the living things found in the fossil record are flawless
and complete. None of them are at transitional stages, as shown
in this picture. This fact is an important proof that evolution
never took place.
|
Mutations that arise unconsciously cannot form a new, flawless structure.
They always give rise to deformed, lopsided and deficient ones. Human
hands, according to the theory of evolution, are the work of random mutations-which
actually cannot give rise to hands that are aesthetically pleasing, functional,
able to sculpt statues, grasp, and feel.
Until they reach the most ideal level (something which mutations can
never actually do), they must construct a sequence of deformed hands,
arms, feet and legs. For instance, every finger needs to go through millions
of phases before attaining its present length. According to evolutionists'
claims, every generation will attempt a large number of trial sequences
to produce fingers from wrists until they are finally arranged in the
correct order.
If you randomly flung Scrabble tiles with letters on them onto the board,
you cannot expect them to line up in a regular order and create meaningful
words, much less sentences. Neither can you expect random mutations to
form hands of fingers, arm or leg bones, in any regular, functional and
aesthetic order.
|
LIKE THOSE IN THE FRAME, ALL
KNOWN HUMAN SKULLS ARE SYMMETRICAL, REGULAR AND COMPLETE.
CONTRARY TO EVOLUTIONISTS'
EXPECTATIONS, THERE IS NO TRACE IN THE FOSSIL RECORD OF DEFECTIVE,
ASYMMETRICAL SKULLS, LIKE THOSE WITHOUT
FRAMES AND DELIBERATELY MADE.
|
For instance, the bones in your foot have been specially designed to
let you walk in the most ideal, least tiring manner, and to keep to a
minimum perception of your body's weight. . The arch of your foot supports
those bones against the weight of your body. For that reason, soles with
"fallen arches" have difficulty in walking. If we accept the evolutionist
claims as correct, foot bones would have to go through an infinite number
of phases before reaching this ideal state. But in fact, fully formed
and flawless feet always appear in the fossil record, and never mid-phase
ones.
According to evolutionists' claims, malformed phases of a backbone should
also be encountered in the fossil record. The human backbone consists
of 33 small, round bones known as vertebra, set one above the other, and
is of vital importance to any vertebrate, not just human beings. The backbone
bears all the weight of the upper part of the human body. The spine's
curved S shape permits equal load distribution. With every step you take
while walking, a counter-force is set up from the ground because of your
body's weight. Thanks to the shock absorbers possessed by the backbone
and its force-distributing curved shape, this force does no damage to
your body. Were it not for these shock absorbers and S shape, then the
force set up would be transferred directly to your skull, and the top
of the backbone would wear away the base of the skull and enter the brain.
All the vertebrae of the backbones of creatures portrayed as man's alleged
ancestors are exceedingly regular. The oldest known vertebrates, fish
from the Cambrian Period, and all the fish and land vertebrates which
appeared after them possess regular spinal structures, unique to their
body's shape. There are no transitional forms between any of them.
Again according to the theory of evolution, chance must have produced
hundreds of thousands of transitional forms until arriving at these perfectly
formed vertebrae. Until the curved S shape was reached in humans, for
instance, there must have been a great many transitional forms, until
the point was reached when the backbone would not impact the skull bone.
The 33 components of the human backbone could not have come into being
suddenly, but would be built stage by stage over thousands of generations.
This incremental development, of course, would leave behind at least some
traces in the fossil record, and very early fossils with two vertebrae,
five vertebrae and twelve vertebrae would be found. However, what actually
appears in the record is vertebrates with the most suitable structures
and features for the body shape in question. In terms of form and structure,
none is deformed, defective, or incomplete. On the contrary, they are
perfect. No transitional backbones of the type seen in the pictures below
have been encountered anywhere in the fossil record.
 |
If living things really had come into being as
the result of random mutations, as evolutionists would have us
believe, then until, say, a rhinoceros' or deer's horns emerged,
there would have been countless deformed and odd-looking horns.
These would inevitably appear in the fossil record. Yet all the
horns in that record are fully and perfectly formed.
(1) AN IMAGINARY ANTELOPE TRANSITIONAL FORM WHICH DOES NO T APPEAR
IN THE FOSSIL RECORD
(2) A REGULAR ANTELOPE SKULL
(3) AN ANTELOPE WITH COMPLETE, SYMMETRICAL AND FLAWLESS HORNS
|
 |
IF THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION WERE
TRUE, THEN WE SHOULD FREQUENTLY ENCOUNTER IN THE FOSSIL RECORD DEFECTIVE
AND PECULIAR HAND AND ARM STRUCTURES, OF THE KIND SHOWN. YET ALL
THE KNOWN HAND AND ARM FORMS ARE EXCEPTIONALLY FUNCTIONAL AND REGULAR. |
 |
|
A REGULAR, HUMAN FOOT BONE (picture: 5)
The imaginary, defective foot structures in shown above (pictures:
1-4) are of such a kind as to prevent a human being walking, or
even standing upright. Yet all the known foot-bone fossils possess
an ideal design. No abnormalities of this sort are encountered.
IMAGINARY, DEFECTIVE FOOT BONE STRUCTURES
NOT FOUND ANYWHERE IN THE FOSSIL RECORD (pictures: 1-4)
|
 |
 |
|
IMAGINARY, DEFECTIVE BACKBONE FORMS
(picture: 1-3)
The real human backbone is exceedingly regular
and possesses the ideal flexible design to keep the body upright.
No trace is to be found of transitional-form backbones that evolutionists
claim must have existed.
ACTUAL HUMAN BACKBONE (picture: 4)
|
If the stage-by-stage development proposed by
evolutionists had actually taken place, then there should have been
vertebrates starting with two or five vertebrae, like those above.
Yet there is no sign of such species in the fossil record. On the
contrary, all the known backbones possess their perfect, present-day
forms.
|
 |
The living things that evolutionists
maintain represent transitional forms are actually species with
complete and flawless structures.
They have no transitional characteristics whatsoever.
(1) A 150-million-year-old Archaeopteryx
fossil
(2) Archaeopteryx, shown on the left, is claimed by evolutionists
to be a transitional form, but has actually been proved to be a
fully flying bird.
(3) The "living fossil" coelacanth, still alive today, is a fully
formed fish.
(4) A 410-million-year-old coelacanth fossil.
|
All species, living or extinct in the fossil record, are present fully
formed and in the most perfect states. The species that evolutionists
propose as transitional forms exhibit none of the features of such evolving
anatomies. They have no missing or intermediate-stage organs or structures.
There are no half-formed or missing features in their skulls, backbones,
hands or feet. All living things exist in their most perfect states.
| He created the heavens and the Earth with truth. He is exalted above
anything they associate with Him. He created man from a drop of sperm
and yet he is an open challenger! And He created livestock. There
is warmth for you in them, and various uses and some you eat. And
there is beauty in them [livestock] for you in the evening when you
bring them home and in the morning when you drive them out to graze.
(Surat An-Nahl; 3-6) |
There are no fossilized forerunners to dragonflies,
owls, fish or squirrels, for instance, in the Earth's strata. There
are no strange fossils vaguely reminiscent of a dragonfly, slightly
resembling an owl, or that also bear partial features belonging to other,
later species. All these facts demonstrate that the theory of evolution's
claim of living things that developed in stages over millions of years
is a complete fantasy. Despite all the studies and quests for proof
by evolutionists over roughly the last century and a half, not a single
piece of evidence to back up their claims has ever been found.
|