Harun Yahya - The Disasters Darwinism Brought to Humanity - Chapter 3
The Disasters Darwinism Brought To Humanity
Chapter 3
The Terrible Alliance Between Darwin
and Fascism
The Bloody Alliance Between Darwin and Hitler
Nazism was born in the chaos of the Germany which emerged defeated from
the First World War. The leader of the party was the angry and aggressive
Adolf Hitler. Racism formed the basis of Hitler's world view. Hitler believed
that the Aryan race, the fundamental element of the German nation, was
superior to all the other races and had to rule them. He dreamed that
the Aryan race would found a world empire that would last 1,000 years.
The scientific support Hitler found for these racist theories was Darwin's
theory of evolution.
Hitler's most important idea-moulder, the racist German
historian Heinrich von Treitschke, was strongly affected by Darwin's theory
of evolution and based his racist views on Darwinism. He used to say,
"Nations can only develop by violent competition like Darwin's survival
of the fittest," and declared that this meant lasting and inevitable war.
His view was that, "Conquering by the sword is a way of bringing civilisation
to barbarism and knowledge to ignorance." He thought: "The yellow races
have no understanding of artistic ability and political freedom. It is
the destiny of the black races to serve the whites and to be the target
of the whites' loathing for all eternity…"43
While Hitler was developing his theories he drew inspiration,
like Treitschke, from Darwin and particularly Darwin's idea of the fight
for survival. The title of his notorious book Mein Kampf ("My Struggle")
was inspired by the idea of this fight for survival. Just like Darwin,
Hitler gave non-European races the status of monkeys, and said, "Take
away the Nordic Germans and nothing remains but the dance of apes."44
In the 1933 Nuremberg party rally, Hitler proclaimed
that "a higher race subjects to itself a lower race… a right which we
see in nature and which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right,"
because it was founded on science.45
Hitler, who believed in the superiority of the Aryan race, believed that
the superiority of this race was given to it by nature. In Mein Kampf
he wrote the following:
The Jews formed a sub-human counter race, predestined
by their biological heritage to evil, just as the Nordic race was designated
for nobility… History would culminate in a new millennial empire of unparalleled
splendour, based on a new racial hierarchy ordained by nature herself.46
Hitler, who thought that human beings were highly developed animals,
believed that instead of allowing natural forces and chance, in a word
coincidence, to control evolution, it was necessary to take the management
of it into his own hands to develop the human race. And this was the ultimate
aim of the Nazi movement. In order to realise this aim, the first step
was to separate, to isolate, the inferior races from the Aryan race, the
race they believed to be superior.
At this point the Nazis moved to the implementation of Darwinism, and
took as their example the "theory of eugenics" which itself had its origins
in Darwinism.
The Theory of Eugenics Was Based on Darwin's
Ideas
The theory of eugenics, which emerged in the first half of the 20th century,
meant the weeding out of sick and handicapped people and the "improving"
of the human race by increasing the number of healthy individuals. According
to the theory of eugenics, in the same way that better kinds of animals
can be produced by mating healthy animals with each other, so the human
race could be improved in the same way.
As
might be expected, those who put forward the eugenics programme were Darwinists.
At the head of the eugenics wave in England came Charles Darwin's cousin,
Francis Galton, and his son Leonard Darwin.
It was clear that the idea of eugenics was a natural result of Darwinism.
In fact, this truth was awarded special importance in those publications
which supported eugenics, "Eugenics is man's taking charge of his own
evolution," it was said.
Kenneth Ludmerer, a medical historian at Washington University, noted
that the idea of eugenics is as old as Plato's Republic but he also added
that Darwinism was the reason for the rise in interest in the idea in
the 19th century:
… modern eugenics thought arose only in the nineteenth
century. The emergence of interest in eugenics during that century had
multiple roots. The most important was the theory of evolution, for Francis
Galton's ideas on eugenics-and it was he who created the term "eugenics"-were
a direct logical outgrowth of the scientific doctrine elaborated by his
cousin, Charles Darwin.47
In Germany the first person to be influenced by and to spread eugenics
was the famous evolutionary biologist Ernst Haeckel. Haeckel was a close
friend and supporter of Darwin. To support the theory of evolution, he
put forward the claim "recapitulation," which proposed that the embryos
of different living creatures resembled one another. It later emerged
that Haeckel had falsified the data when putting forward this claim.
While
Haeckel was on the one hand making scientific forgeries of this kind,
on the other he was putting forward eugenic propaganda. He suggested that
newly-born handicapped children should be killed forthwith and that this
would speed up the evolution of society. He went even further, claiming
that lepers and people with cancer and mental illnesses should be painlessly
killed, or else these people would be a burden on society and would slow
down evolution.
The American researcher George Stein summed up Haeckel's blind allegiance
to the theory of evolution in an article of his in the magazine American
Scientist in this way:
… [Haeckel] argued that Darwin was correct … humankind
had unquestionably evolved from the animal kingdom. Thus, and here the
fatal step was taken in Haeckel's first major exposition of Darwinism
in Germany, humankind's social and political existence is governed by
the laws of evolution, natural selection, and biology, as clearly shown
by Darwin. To argue otherwise was backward superstition.48
Haeckel
died in 1919. But his ideas were inherited by the Nazis. Shortly after
Hitler came to power an official eugenics programme was initiated. Hitler
summed up the new policy in these sentences:
In the popular state, the education of the mind and
the body will play an important role, but human selection is just as important.
…The state has the responsibility of declaring as unfit for reproductive
purposes anyone who is obviously ill or genetically unsound. … and must
carry through with this responsibility ruthlessly without respect to understanding
or lack of understanding on the part of anyone. …Stopping reproduction
of the bodily degenerate or psychically ill for a period of only 600 years
would lead …to an improvement in human health which can hardly be envisaged
today. If the fertility of the healthiest members of the race were realized
and planned the result would be a race which … would have lost the seeds
of bodily and spiritual decay which we now carry. 49
As a necessity of this policy of Hitler's, the mentally ill, the disabled,
the blind from birth, and those with genetic diseases in German society,
were rounded up in special "sterilisation centres." These people were regarded
as parasites harmful to the purity and evolutionary progress of the German
race. A while later in fact, these people who were removed from society
began to be killed by secret order of Hitler.
Jesse Owens runs for another gold at the Games. Hitler refused to
even shake his hand, because he was black
These murders were presented as perfectly reasonable and those who were
accepted as genetically inferior were described as "unprofitable" and
obstacle to the development of the nation. Groups, including various races
and peoples, which were seen as inferior races slowly began to be included.
Later again sick elderly people, those with jaundice, those with serious
mental defects, the deaf and dumb, and even those with fatal diseases
were included. After the black athlete Jesse Owens won four gold medals
at the 1936 Berlin Olympics, Hitler, even though he congratulated all
the competitors, refused to congratulate Jesse Owens and left the stadium.
Some evolutionists even advocated the view that women were evolutionarily
inferior to men. Dr Robert Wartenberg, later a
prominent neurology professor in California, tried to prove women's inferiority
by arguing that they could not survive unless they were 'protected by
men'. He concluded that because the weaker women were not eliminated as
rapidly due to this protection, a slower rate of evolution resulted and
for this reason natural selection was less operative on women than men.
Based on these thoughts, women in Nazi Germany were openly prohibited
from entering certain professions.50
Following the development of Darwinism and the idea
of eugenics, In Germany, "racial scientists" openly advocated the killing
of unwanted members and segments of the population. One of these scientists,
Adolf Jost, "issued an early call for direct medical killing in a book
published in 1895, Das Recht auf den Tod (The Right to Death). Jost argued
that "for the sake of the health of the social organism, the state must
take responsibility for the death of individuals." Adolf Jost was a mentor
to Adolf Hitler, who showed himself on the political stage nearly 30 years
later. "The state must see to it that only the healthy beget children,"
Hitler said. "It must declare unfit for propagation all who are in any
way visibly sick or who have inherited a disease and can therefore pass
it on."51
Under a law passed in 1933, 350,000 mentally ill people,
30,000 gypsies, and hundreds of black children were sterilised by such
methods as castration, x-rays, injection, and electric shocks to the genital
area. One Nazi officer said, "National Socialism is nothing but applied
biology."52
As well as attempting to hasten the development of the German race by
the murder of and ruthless policies directed at innocent people, Hitler
was also implementing another condition of eugenics. Blond, blue-eyed
men and women, accepted as representative of the German race, were encouraged
to form relationships and have children. In 1935 special reproduction
farms were established for this purpose. These farms, where young girls
conforming to racist criteria were installed, were frequently visited
by SS units. The illegitimate children born on these farms were to be
raised as the soldiers of the intended 1,000-year German kingdom.
The Nazis' Aryan Racial Aberration
The
Nazis again used Darwinist concepts to allegedly prove the superiority of
the Aryan race. Darwin had proposed that as people evolved so their skulls
grew larger. The Nazis embraced this idea fiercely and set about taking
skull measurements to show that the German race was superior. In all corners
of Nazi Germany comparisons were made showing that German skulls were larger
than those of other races. Teeth, eyes, hair and other features were evaluated
with evolutionary measurements. Individuals found not to match up to German
race measurements were to be exterminated in the name of the principles
of eugenics.
All this madness was carried out in the name of implementing Darwinist
principles on society. The American historian Michael Grodin, author of
the book The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, reveals the reality
in this way:
I think what happened was that there was a perfect
match of Nazi ideology and Social Darwinism and racial hygiene as it developed
in the turn of the 20th Century.53
George Stein explains the subject;
National socialism, whatever else it may have been
was ultimately the first fully self-conscious attempt to organize a political
community on a basis of an explicit biopolicy: a biopolicy fully congruent
with the scientific facts of the Darwinian revolution.54
The famous evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith comments on Hitler as follows:
The German Führer is an evolutionist; he has consciously
sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of evolution.55
The
author of the book Darwin: Before and After, Robert Clarke, concluded,
Adolf Hitler: "…was captivated by evolutionary teaching - probably since
the time he was a boy. Hitler reasoned … that a higher race would always
conquer a lower."56 The political philosophy of Nazi
Germany took shape under the influence of these ideas of Hitler's.
The author of the book Race and Reich, Joseph Tenenbaum noted that the
political philosophy of Germany was built on the belief that critical
for evolutionary progress were:
… struggle, selection, and survival of the fittest,
all notions and observations arrived at … by Darwin … but already in luxuriant
bud in the German social philosophy of the nineteenth century. … Thus
developed the doctrine of Germany's inherent right to rule the world on
the basis of superior strength … [of a] "hammer and anvil" relationship
between the Reich and the weaker nations.57
Adolf Hitler was not alone among Nazi leaders in his
"war of ideological evolution." Heinrich Himmler, head of the Gestapo,
"stated that the law of nature must take its course in the survival of
the fittest." In fact, all of the Nazi leaders were committed both to
evolution and Germanic racism, as were most German scientists and industrialists
during those dark years.58
Hitler's Hatred of Religion
Another
reason for the great importance Hitler attached to the theory of evolution
was his seeing the theory as a weapon against religious belief. Hitler had
a great hatred of divine religions. Moral virtues such as compassion, mercy,
and humility, ordered by divine religions, represented a great obstacle
to the ruthless and warrior Aryan type the Nazis wanted to create. For this
reason, once the Nazis came to power in 1933 they tried to turn German society
back to its old pagan beliefs. The swastika, a symbol from the old pagan
cultures, was a sign of this return. The Nazi ceremonies held in every corner
of Germany were a return to the ancient pagan rites. The idea of evolution,
an inheritance from pagan cultures, fitted in exceedingly well with the
ideology of Nazism for this reason. Hitler once revealed his attitude toward
Christianity when he bluntly stated that religion is an:
…organized lie [that] must be smashed. The State must remain
the absolute master. When I was younger, I thought it was necessary to
set about [destroying religion] …with dynamite. I've since realized there's
room for a little subtlety …. The final state must be … in St. Peter's
Chair, a senile officiant; facing him a few sinister old women… The young
and healthy are on our side … Our peoples had previously succeeded in
living all right without this religion. I have six divisions of SS men
absolutely indifferent in matters of religion.59Daniel
Gasman revealed the reasons for Hitler's hatred of religion in his book
The Scientific Origins of National Socialism:
Hitler stressed and singled out the idea of biological
evolution as the most foremost weapon against traditional religion and
he repeatedly condemned Christianity for its opposition to the teaching
of evolution… For Hitler, evolution was the hallmark of modern science
and culture.60
Actually, the fundamental cause of the countless catastrophes visited upon
the world in the 20th century was the character of such people as Hitler
and the Nazis who had no religion. These people who denied the existence
of God and believed that human beings had evolved to become developed animals,
saw themselves as unchecked, with no responsibility to answer to anyone.
Because they had no fear of God and the hereafter they knew no limit to
their immorality and tyranny, and for that reason they mercilessly killed
millions of people. The difficulties and pains there will be in a society
without religion are clearly to be seen in the example of Hitler. And not
just Hitler: as we shall see later Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Franco, Mussolini
and the others who drowned the 20th century in blood were known for being
completely devoid of religion. A lesson must of course be drawn from the
nightmare which comes from lack of religion.
Whereas those who fear Allah and live by Qur'anic morality always bring
peace, calm, security, plenty, and enlightened times to a society. People
faithful to the religion of Allah never disturb the peace anywhere in
the world, on the contrary they always encourage compassion, pity, friendship,
faithfulness, and co-operation.
These pictures sum up the suffering, fear, terror, and anguish
that Hitler and those who shared his views inflicted on humanity.
Darwinism, which was the ultimate source of this nightmare, still
continues to inflict suffering on mankind all over the world.
The Catastrophes Brought About by the Darwinist-Fascist
Mussolini
In
the same way that Hitler determined his policy by employing Darwinism, so
his contemporary and ally Benito Mussolini made use of Darwinist claims
and concepts to set Italy on imperialist and Fascist foundations.
Mussolini was a thorough Darwinist, who believed that violence
had been a propelling force in history and that war led to revolution.
For him, "the reluctance of England to engage in war only proved the evolutionary
decadence of the British Empire."61
At the head of the magazine The People of Italy (Il Popolo d'Italia),
which he founded with financial assistance from the French government,
he put the phrase, "He who has iron will also have bread." In other words
he was telling the people that in order to be able to fill their stomachs
they needed the power to wage war. Mussolini chose the axe as the symbol
of Fascism and the Fascist Party. Because the axe was the symbol of war,
violence, death, and massacre.
Mussolini's conduct, aggressive and prone to violence
like every Fascist, is described in Denis Mack Smith's book. In his book,
Smith stated that one of Mussolini's unchanging beliefs was aggression
and his fundamental instinct was to resort to violence.62
Like the other Darwinist-Fascists, Mussolini's warlike, aggressive and
oppressive policies led to many people being massacred, being left without
home and family, and to the country's being left in ruins. Violence and
oppression were practised, by means of the Blackshirts, not only in his
own country, but in others too. In 1935 he occupied Ethiopia, and by 1941
had had 15,000 people wiped out. He did not delay in backing and justifying
his occupation of Ethiopia with Darwinism's racialist views. According
to Mussolini the Ethiopians were inferior because they were of the black
race, and being governed by a superior race like the Italians should have
been an honour for them.
On the other hand he continued the oppression of the Muslims which had
begun with Italy's occupation of Libya on Oct. 3, 1911, and actually increased
the attacks aimed against Muslims. The occupation only came to an end
with Mussolini's death in an agreement made on Feb. 10, 1947. During that
period 1.5 million Muslims were martyred and hundreds of thousands wounded.
Mussolini, who has gone down in history for his ruthlessness and oppression,
described the Fascism which he supported and put into practice in a speech:
Fascism is no longer liberation but tyranny, no longer
the safeguard of the nation but the defense of private interests.63
As we have seen in the examples from Hitler and Mussolini, Fascism, where
the strong and cruel were right and superior and where the only way to success
and development was brute force, aggression, violence, and war, was an implementation
of Darwin's claims that "The strong live, the weak die," and led to suffering
for millions.
The Fascist Franco and the Oppression He Gave
Rise to in Spain
Another of the Fascist oppressors who turned the 20th century into a
lake of blood was Franco. He organised the "Falange" movement in Spain
with the support of the Darwinist Fascists Hitler and Mussolini, and brought
great suffering and oppression to the people of Spain. Franco dragged
his people into civil war, turning brother against brother, father against
son.
During the Spanish Civil War an average of 250 people a day were killed
in Madrid, 150 in Barcelona, and 80 in Seville. Some executions were carried
out by driving nails into peoples' heads. Pitiless massacres took place
all over the country. In a little mountain village to the north of Madrid,
for example, 31 villagers were arrested because they had not voted for
Franco, and of these 13 were taken out of the village by lorry and killed
by the side of the road. The Fascists entered a town with a population
of 11,000 near Seville and killed more than 300 people. As a result of
the violent events which went on in this way some 800,000 people were
killed in the civil war, and 200,000 more executed by order of Franco.
Millions were injured or crippled.
Franco Gave Hitler the Population of An Entire
Village to Test His Weapons On!
The greatest supporters of the Fascist Franco in the Civil War were Hitler
and Mussolini. Franco did not leave his allies' support unrewarded: he made
one of the cruellest and most ruthless agreements in history, giving small
towns such as Guernica to the Nazis as a gift for them to test their new
weapons on.
On the morning of May 5, 1937, the people of the small town
of Guernica awoke to the death brought by giant bomber planes and tons
of bombs, the new miracles of Nazi technology. The little town had been
abandoned by Franco to the Nazi plane tests.64
This event was only one of the products of this twisted philosophy which
regarded human beings as laboratory animals. This philosophy, which left
thousands of people to die just in order to test the power of its weapons
and which crippled, injured, and tortured thousands of others, still lives
today under different guises. This will continue for as long as Darwinist
philosophy and similar oppressions which see human beings as a species
of animal and war as the most effective means of progress are kept alive.
Darwinism's Preparatory Role in the First and
Second World Wars
In
his book Europe Since 1870 the famous British professor of history James
Joll explains one of the factors leading to the outbreak of the First World
War as being the belief of the leaders of Europe of the time in Darwinist
ideas:
We have seen how Darwinian ideas had a great influence on the ideology of imperialism
at the end of the nineteenth century, but it is important to realise how
literally the doctrine of the struggle for existence and of the survival
of the fittest was taken by the majority of the leaders of Europe in the
years preceding the First World War. The Austro-Hungarian chief of staff
for example, Franz Baron Conrad von Hoetzendorff, wrote in his memoirs
after the war:
Philanthropic religions, moral teachings and philosophical doctrines may
certainly sometimes serve to weaken mankind's struggle for existence in
its crudest form, but they will never succeed in removing it as a driving
motive of the world… It is in accordance with this great principle that
the catastrophe of the world war came about as the result of the motive
forces in the lives of states and peoples, like a thunderstorm which must
by its nature discharge itself."
Seen against this sort of ideological background, Conrad's insistence
on the need for a preventive war in order to preserve the Austro-Hungarian
monarchy becomes comprehensible.
We
have seen too how these views were not limited to military figures, and
that Max Weber for example was deeply concerned with the international
struggle for survival. Again Kurt Riezler, the personal assistant and
confidant of the German chancellor Theobald von Bethmann-Hollweg, wrote
in 1914: "Eternal and absolute enmity is fundamentally inherent in relations
between peoples; and the hostility which we observe everywhere… is not
the result of a perversion of human nature but is the essence of the world
and the source of life itself."65
Friedrich von Bernhardi, a First World War general
and German Social Darwinist, was also one of these leaders. "War" declared
Bernhardi "is a biological necessity"; it "is as necessary as the struggle
of the elements of nature";it "gives a biologically just decision, since
its decisions rest on the very nature of things."66
As we have seen, the First World War emerged because of the European
thinkers, generals, and leaders who saw waging war, spilling blood, suffering,
and inflicting suffering as a kind of "development" and an immutable law
of nature. The ideological inspiration which dragged this whole generation
to ruin with these completely false ideas was none other than Darwin's
concepts of "struggle for life" and "favoured races." Two years after
Bernhardi said those words, the First World War, which was to bring about
biological development (!) began, leaving behind it 8 million dead, hundreds
of cities in ruins, and millions of wounded, crippled, homeless and unemployed.
The roots of the Nazi war, which started 21 years later and left some
50 million dead, also lie in Darwinism.
Hitler often used to link his policies of war and genocide to Darwinism.
He saw war as not only for eliminating weaker races, but also as a force
for disposing of weaker members of the master race. Nazi Germany praised
war partly for this reason, because in their twisted thinking war was
an essential step for the progress of the race.
The
evolutionist A. E. Wiggam explained "the belief that war develops men,"
on which Hitler based his policy, in a book published in 1922:
… at one time man had scarcely more brains than his
anthropoid cousins, the apes. But, by kicking, biting, fighting … and
outwitting his enemies and by the fact that the ones who had not sense
and strength enough to do this were killed off, man's brain became enormous
and he waxed both in wisdom and agility if not in size ….67
Hitler drew support from evolutionists such as Wiggam and saw war as an
obligation for those who wished to survive. He stated this openly in Mein
Kampf:
The whole world of Nature is a mighty struggle between
strength and weakness-an eternal victory of the strong over the weak.
There would be nothing but decay in the whole of nature if this were not
so. He who would live must fight. He who does not wish to fight in this
world where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to
exist. To think otherwise is to "insult" nature. Distress, misery and
disease are her rejoinders.68
With
the Darwinists' claims that the strong remained after the fight for survival
and that species developed by this means being adapted to human societies,
wars also began to be viewed as a necessity for the development of mankind.
For example, Hitler ascribed Germany's greatness to the elimination by
war of its weaker members over the centuries. Although the Germans were
no strangers to war this new "scientific" justification was a force to
back up their warlike policies.
Elsewhere, Hitler had claimed, "human civilization
as we know it would not exist if it were not for constant war"69
Haeckel proposed, on the subject of war, that the savage
methods of the Spartans, one of the city states that made up Ancient Greece,
should be implemented. He wrote that "by killing all but the 'perfectly
healthy and strong children' the Spartans were 'continually in excellent
strength and vigor'."70
War was viewed as "an indispensable regulator" of populations
all over Europe, and not just in Germany. "If it were not for war," German
Social Darwinist Friedrich Von Bernhardi writes, "we should probably find
that inferior and degenerate races would overcome healthy and youthful
ones by their wealth and their numbers. The generative importance of war
lies in this, that it causes selection, and thus war becomes a biological
necessity."71
As we have seen from our account so far, Hitler and the Nazi ideologues
who supported him saw war as a necessity with the inspiration they drew
from Darwinism. And by implementing this necessity they visited various
miseries on their own people, and on the other peoples of the world. From
this point of view it will therefore be absolutely correct to identify
Charles Darwin as one of those primarily responsible for the sufferings
experienced in World War II.
Professor
Dr. Jerry Bergman demonstrates the effect of Darwinism on the Second World
War:
The evidence is very clear that Darwinian ideas had
a tremendous impact on German thought and practice… In fact, Darwinian
ideas had a tremendous influence on causing WWII, the loss of 40 million
lives, and the waste of about 6 trillion dollars. Firmly convinced that
evolution was true, Hitler saw himself as the modern savior of humankind…
By breeding a superior race, the world would look upon him as the man
who pulled humanity up to a higher level of evolution.72
Of course there had been countless wars in the world before Darwin put his
theory forward. But due to the effects of his theory, war was for the first
time given a false approval by science. Max Nordau drew attention to Darwin's
negative role in the subject of wars in an article called The Philosophy
and Morals of War, which made waves in America:
The greatest authority of all the advocates of war is Darwin.
Since the theory of evolution has been promulgated, they can cover their
natural barbarism with the name of Darwin and proclaim the sanguinary
instincts of their inmost hearts as the last word of science.73
It was no coincidence that the 20th century should see the bloodiest
wars the world has known, coming as it did after the 19th century, which
was formed by the ideas of such materialist ideologues as Darwin, Marx,
and Freud. Darwinism had prepared the theoretical and so-called scientific
ground which would end in war, and the despots who saw war as indispensable
for the growth of humanity killed a total of 60 million people in both
world wars.
The Neo-Nazis
Even
though Fascist leaders such as Hitler and Mussolini, and the Nazi organisations
linked to them (the SA, the SS, the Gestapo) or Mussolini's "Blackshirts"
today seem like a thing of the past, Neo-Nazi organisations which follow
their ideas are still active. In recent years in particular, racist and
Fascist movements have re-awoken in many European countries. At the forefront
of these movements come the Neo-Nazis in Germany.
The Neo-Nazis consist of unemployed hooligans, drug addicts, and bloodthirsty
types, and possess all features of the Fascist mentality. One news article
about the Neo-Nazis shows how attracted they are to blood and violence:
Blood, honour, and fanaticism… It is possible to
sum up the values of the members of the Fascist Olympia Group in just
these three words. Today the organisation has 35,000 members. And in all
their eyes can be seen the inordinate desire to rise.74
The Neo-Nazis have been influenced by the same Darwinist understanding
as their "greats," Hitler and the other Nazi leaders. On the Internet
pages which they set up for Nazi and racist propaganda it is possible
to come across Darwin's words and praise for Darwin, because Darwin gives
support to all the Neo-Nazis' movements and ideas. In their pages, therefore,
they put Darwinism forward as a theory which must be accepted, without
feeling the need for any evidence.
The
attacks and murders the Neo-Nazis carry out are completely ruthless. Neo-Nazis
take pleasure in burning people to death, frightening them, and torturing
little children, and Turks are one of their main targets. Neo-Nazis reveal
their hatred and enmity of Turks in every corner of their Internet sites,
and show this hatred in action. This statement about Turks appeared in
one Neo-Nazi site:
For instance, if it were in my power today, I would
like to see a large part of the Turks in gas chambers.75The
name the Neo-Nazis base their enmity of the Turks on is once again Charles
Darwin. The Neo-Nazis think they are providing a so-called scientific explanation
for their hatred of Turks by making extracts from Darwin's false and unintelligent
claims regarding them. On the last page of this chapter you can see some
Neo-Nazi Internet sites which praise Darwin and show the kind of things
they have to say about the Turkish nation.
Neo-Nazi violence against Turks and other peoples has recently been on the
rise. The Turkish daily Sabah dated August 12, 2000 gave a list of Neo-Nazi
attacks during the summer of 2000:
- In June, the windows of the El Rahman Mosque in the town of Gera
in the state of Thüringen were broken.
- Two molotov cocktails were thrown at a Turkish mosque in the small
town of Eppingen in the state of Baden-Württemberg.
- A molotov cocktail was thrown at the Green Mosque in the Utersen
quarter of Pinneberg.
- A building lived in by Turks was set fire to in Memingen.
- In Bocholt a Turkish café and a building lived in by Lebanese were
set on fire. Fourteen people were wounded, one seriously.
- In the East German town of Chemnitz the seven-month-old
baby of an Iraqi family was thrown to the ground. The baby's face was
injured when it hit the concrete.76
There
were much nastier incidents in the recent past. Taking
Darwin's enmity of the Turks as their guide, the Neo-Nazis organised an
attack on Turks in Möln in November 1992. Later, in 1993, five Turks were
burned by Neo-Nazis in Solingen.77 The press described
this attack as, "The bloodiest racist attack in German history since the
Nazi era." Attacks of this kind were often seen in the years that followed.
Fires were started in Turks' homes, Turks were beaten and injured. As well
as in Germany, similar attacks took place in Holland. In one attack directed
at Turks a woman and her five children were killed. People who took part
in the mourning march that was held received threatening letters with swastikas
on.
These incidents are just a few of the racist attacks against Turks. Attacks
and murders by these Fascist groups, the inheritors of Darwin and Fascists
such as Hitler, still continue. Legal measures will not be enough to stop
these inhuman groups' attacks. The sure way to put an end to them is to
wage a serious ideological war alongside the legal measures. The outrages
perpetrated by these people who see racism as a law of nature will not
come to an end so long as Darwinist ideas are not knocked down as science.
43- Alaeddin Senel, Irk ve Irkçilik Düsüncesi (The Idea of
Race and Racism), Ankara:Bilim ve Sanat Yayinlari, 1993, pp.62-6 44- War Against Religion http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Meadows/1733/book2-ch3.html 45- J. Tenenbaum., Race and Reich, Twayne Pub., New York, p.
211, 1956; cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust, http://www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 46- L.H. Gann, "Adolf Hitler, The Complete Totalitarian", The
Intercollegiate Review, Fall 1985, p. 24; cited in Henry M. Morris, The Long
war Against God, Baker Book House, 1989, p. 78 47- K. Ludmerer., Eugenics, In: Encyclopedia of Bioethics,
Edited by Mark Lappe, The Free Press, New York, p. 457, 1978; cited by Jerry
Bergman, Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust, www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 48- G. Stein., Biological science and the roots of Nazism,
American Scientist 76(1):p. 54, 1988; cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism and
the Nazi Race Holocaust, http://www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 49- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf, München: Verlag Franz Eher Nachfolger,
1993, p. 44, 447-448; cited by A.E. Wilder Smith, Man's Origin Man's Destiny,
The Word For Today Publishing 1993, p. 163, 164 50- P. Weindling, Health, Race and German Policies Between
National Unification and Nazism 1870-1945, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
MA, 1989, cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism and The Nazi Race Holocaust, www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 51- Theodore D. Hall, The Scientific Background of the Nazi
"Race Purification" Program, http://www.trufax.org/avoid/nazi.html 52- Theodore D. Hall, The Scientific Background of the Nazi
"Race Purification" Program, http://www.trufax.org/avoid/nazi.html 53- John J. Michalczyk (editor), Nazi Medicine: In The Shadow
of The Reich (documentary film), First Run Features, New York, 1997 54- George J. Stein, "Biological Science and the Roots of Nazism",
American Scientist, vol. 76, (January/February 1988), p. 52 55- Sir Arthur Keith, Evolution and Ethics, New York: G.P.
Putnam's Sons, 1947, p. 1 56- Robert Clark, Darwin: Before and After, Grand Rapids International
Press, Grand Rapids, MI, 1958. p.115 57- A. Keith, Evolution and Ethics, G. P. Putnam's Sons, New
York, p. 230, 1946, cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust,
www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 58- Francis Schaeffer, How Shall We Then Live?, Old Tappan,
N.J.: Revell, 1976, p. 151; cited in Henry M. Morris, The Long war Against God,
Baker Book House, 1989, p. 78 59- A. Hitler, Hitler's Secret Conversations 1941-1944, With
an introductory essay on The Mind of Adolf Hitler by H.R. Trevor-Roper, Farrar,
Straus and Young, New York, p. 117, 1953; cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism
and the Nazi Race Holocaust, http://www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 60- Daniel Gasman, The Scientific Origins of National Socialism:
Social Darwinism in Earnest Haeckel and the German Monist League, New York:
American Elsevier Press, 1971, p. 168 61- Robert E.D. Clark, Darwin: Before and After, London: Paternoster
Press, 1948, p. 115, cited in Henry M. Morris, The Long War Against God, Baker
Book House, 1989, p. 81 62- Denis Mack Smith, Mussolini, p. 14 63- John P. Diggins, Mussolini and Fascism, Princeton University
Press, 1972, p. 15 64- Çagdas Liderler Ansiklopedisi (The Encyclopaedia of Contemporary
Leaders), Vol. 2, p. 669 65- James Joll, Europe Since 1870: An International History,
Penguin Books, Middlesex, 1990, p. 164 66- M.F. Ashley-Montagu, Man in Process (New York: World. Pub.
Co. 1961) pp. 76, 77 cited in Bolton Davidheiser, W E Lammers (ed) Scientific
Studies in Special Creationism, 1971, p. 338-339 67- A.E. Wiggam, The New Dialogue of Science, Garden Publishing
Co., Garden City, NY, p. 102, 1922; cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism and the
Nazi Race Holocaust, http://www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 68- Robert Clark, Darwin: Before and After, Grand Rapids International
Press, Grand Rapids, MI, 1958., s. 115-116; cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism
and the Nazi Race Holocaust, http://www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 69- Jerry Bergman, Darwinism and the Nazi Race Holocaust, http://www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 70- Earnest Haeckel, The History of Creation: Or the Development
of the Earth and Its Inhabitants by the Action of Natural Causes, Appleton,
New York, 1876, p. 170; cited by Jerry Bergman, Darwinism and the Nazi Race
Holocaust, http://www.trueorigin.org/holocaust.htm 71- Theodore D. Hall, The Scientific Background of the Nazi
"Race Purification" Program, http://www.trufax.org/avoid/nazi.html 72- Marshall Hall, Hitler, Lenin, Stalin, Mao et al: The Role
of Darwinian Evolutionism in Their Lives, http://www.fixedearth.com/hlsm.html 73- Max Nordau, The Philosophy and Morals of War, North American
Review 169 (1889):794 cited in Richard Hofstadter, Social Darwinism in American
Thought, Boston: Beacon Press, 1955, p.171) 74- Tempo Magazine, 14 July 19 75- http://chefsseite.tsx.org/ 76- Sabah Daily, 12 August 2000 77- San Francisco Examiner, 1 April1997