Chapter 1: Why Do They Want to Separate the Southeast of Turkey?
An Artifical Term; "The Kurdish Problem"
The term "The Kurdish Problem" has been widely used in Turkey for many years now. And this term has succeeded in misleading people for many years; so much so that some people imagine they are dealing with a problem originating from our Kurdish brothers. They have come to believe as fact an artificial grudge between Turks and Kurds, as if our Kurdish brothers were traitors and not members of the Turkish Republic. The name "Kurdish Problem" thus became a propaganda tool.
Yet the term "The Kurdish Problem" is an utter deception, a false phrase intended to foster division between Turks and our Kurdish brothers. With the constant use of the term "Kurdish Problem," the impression has been given that there really is a problem between Kurds and Turks and an artificial climate of distrust has ensued. The Laz people from the area of the Black Sea, Circassians, Georgians and all ethnic groups live in peace and comfort as Turks in Turkish territory. They maintain their own traditions, use their own languages freely and describe themselves as "Turks." Yet all of a sudden, Kurds have been made to question their "Turkishness." With the establishment of an artificial division between Turks and Kurds, who have lived together as Turks in the same lands for many years, a great many people have come to imagine there really is a problem and today's talk of separatism has thus found an artificial foundation. But the fact is that a sly and dangerous game is being played behind the idea of a "Kurdish Problem."
This artificial question, referred to as the "Kurdish Problem" and supported by certain circles, is preparation for the communist, Stalinist and Leninist rule that efforts are being made to establish in the region. As we all know, communist regimes thrive in a climate of disorder and conflict. In order for a communist regime to take over, an uprising against the rule of the state has first to be initiated and an air of conflict thus created. Since communism makes conflict, savagery and terror essential (as we shall be seeing in greater detail in later chapters), once disorder has been brought about, the appropriate foundations will have been laid for a communist regime. That tactic has been employed in all countries ruled by communist regimes, such as the People's Republic of China, Cambodia and North Korea; their peoples have been incited by propaganda techniques, and the savage regimes that have subsequently been formed have since slaughtered millions of people in those countries. The stratagems being employed in Southeast Turkey are part of just such a plan.
The initial preparations for a communist, Stalinist and Leninist rule in Southeast Turkey are being made, and an artificial "Kurdish Problem" is being manufactured for that purpose. By constantly engaging in media propaganda along those lines, some secret communists working in media organizations are encouraging the idea that dividing the motherland can resolve the problem. But the fact is that giving away land is the beginning of terrible disasters.
Is a federation the only solution to the Kurdish problem?
We must consider an autonomous state in order to be free from terror.
"Give it up and be freed" for social peace?
MISLEADING STATEMENTS BY SOME OF THE PRESS
People need to be well aware that the problem in the Southeast of Turkey has nothing to do with Kurdish nationalism or the conditions in which the Kurds find themselves. And again they need to be aware of the kind of climate of disorder tried to be brought about using the pretext of the supposed "Kurdish problem." There needs to be a close examination of the ideology of the PKK in order for people to better understand how our Kurdish brothers are being misused in this wicked system. That perverse ideology is that of Marxism, materialism, Stalinism and Leninism, and its one and only foundation is Darwinism.
The PKK is a Darwinist, Markxist, Stalinist and Leninist Organization
What Kind of Ideology is Darwinism?
Darwinism, or the theory of evolution, espouses the fictitious claim that life on Earth began by chance and that all the living species on Earth descended from one another, again by chance – in other words, that they evolved. According to this claim (a complete deception in scientific terms), the starting point for all the variety of life on Earth was a bacterium that formed spontaneously in muddy water and life forms assumed their present forms by descending from that bacterium. Again according to this illogical claim, human beings are also descended from some species of ape and subsequently became human. According to this facile logic of the theory of evolution, which has lost all validity in the face of modern science, in order for a chimpanzee to be able to turn into a human being, all it had to do was experiment with standing upright a few times, be able to make a bit of use of tools and lose its fur because of the heat.
This is of course pure myth. The theory of evolution is the worst scientific fraud in history. Darwinists are unable to account for even a single protein possessed by the imaginary first bacterium they regard as the origin of life because it is impossible for a single protein to come into being by chance. In addition to being definitely impossible, even if we assume that life did emerge spontaneously in some way, that still changes nothing, because it is also impossible for one species to turn into another. No life form can ever possess new characteristics outside those encoded in its own genes. Genetics absolutely refutes that claim.
To briefly summarize the basic points that cause the theory of evolution to collapse in the face of science:
Living things can never step outside their own genetic information and can never acquire new information not contained in their genes either over time or through external effects.
Mutations can never cause progress in a living thing. They always injure the organism. They can never, ever add to the genetic information of a living thing.
Billions of fossil records should have been discovered to document the fictitious change from one species to another, in other words there should be many "transitional forms." But THERE EXISTS NOT ONE transitional form fossil anywhere to confirm Darwinists' claims of a passage from one species to another.
Although there are no transitional forms, there are more than 350 million fossils showing that life forms have remained unchanged for millions of years – in other words, that they never evolved.
The most important point, however – as described above– IS THAT DARWINISTS ARE UNABLE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE SPONTANEOUS FORMATION OF A SINGLE PROTEIN. This great truth is in and of itself sufficient to totally invalidate the theory of evolution.
The fossil record is exceedingly rich and sufficiently numerous for us to understand the origin of life. When we examine fossils we see that living species emerged independently, in a single moment and with all their different structures, with no imaginary evolutionary "transitional forms" between them. And this is one of the proofs that Almighty God creates all living things.
1. This fossil garfish is 152 million years old and has never changed.
2. A 125-millionyear- old fossil scorpion.
3. This beetle, one of the darkling beetles, is 100 million years old and the species is still alive today.
4. This fossil sycamore leaf is 54 to 37 million years old and has remained unchanged for millions of years.
5. This fossil gingko leaf is 290 to 248 million years old and identical to present-day specimens.
As can be seen from all this, the theory of evolution is a massive fraud refuted by science, a theory that collapses right from the start when it fails to account for the origin of life. (For more detail of the fraudulent nature of evolution and the scientific facts that eliminate that fraud, see The Evolution Deceit - Harun Yahya, and Atlas of Creation - Harun Yahya)
The subject we shall be concentrating on here is to reveal the ideological aspect of the theory of evolution, rather than producing scientific evidence of its invalidity. The reason for this is because Darwinism represents the supposed basis for all materialist, communist and fascist ideologies.
It is exceedingly difficult to keep a fraud propped up and make people support it in the face of scientific developments. In order to do that, they first familiarize people with the logic of evolution through demagoguery and propaganda. The Darwinist dictatorship is at work to that end. After taking over states, governments, the media in all countries, universities, schools and scientists, the Darwinist dictatorship then began using them to spread this fraud. People who opposed evolution were silenced, one-sided instruction in evolutionary theory was given in schools and a biased pro-evolutionary indoctrination was carried out in the media. Thus, people were obliged to either believe in evolution or at least appear to believe in it. In this way, the idea of evolution entered everyone's minds as an indisputable concept.
How does Darwinism provide an intellectual basis for savagery?
What we have seen so far is the essential logic of Darwinism. It is important that this should be known, because this ideology is responsible for savagery, slaughter, terror, hatred and conflict.
Darwinists regard man as a highly developed species of animal. Therefore, in the perverse eyes of a Darwinist, human beings are of equal value to animals. For a Darwinist, a human being possesses the same value and importance as an animal. To put it another way, human beings "are of no value or importance" for a Darwinist at all.
According to Darwinism, if a living thing in nature is to develop and become strong and advantaged, the presence of a climate in which the strong eliminate the weak is essential. In other words, there needs to be constant competition in nature. In this fictitious, Darwinist climate of conflict, one species will supposedly try to eliminate all other species, and it is thus always the strong that survive. This struggle also goes on between members of the same species, and even of the same family. Every individual enters the fray for its own selfish existence. This false tale represents the basis of Darwinism.
This tale constitutes the basis of Darwinists' theories and worldview. Because of this supposed conflict that they believe exists in nature, Darwinists constantly speak of a "nature red in tooth and claw" in which the weak are eliminated. According to their erroneous beliefs, since human beings are also a species of animal, the same conflict and elimination must also apply to human societies. Therefore, under this perverse logic, the weak can only be eliminated through conflict, war and terror.
This is, of course, totally false. Of course nature is not a battlefield in which living things are in a competition to the death. Living things exhibit amazing instances of affection, compassion and altruism, not only to their own species and offspring, but also toward other species. This represents a powerful challenge to Darwinism. The existence of an entity that risks its own life for its community, that is willing to starve or even die for its offspring and that even protects the offspring of species other than its own is by itself more than sufficient to refute Darwinism's perverse claim that "The strong have to eliminate the weak in order to survive." That is why Darwinists are very careful to avoid mentioning these amazing characteristics in living things, because when evidence is produced that affection, solidarity and compassion, not a ruthless struggle, reign in nature, Darwinism will no longer be able to represent the foundation for the claim that life consists of fighting and conflict. To put it another way, bloodthirsty communist and fascist ideologies will lose their intellectual foundations.
The essential logic of the theory of evolution thus prepares the groundwork for aggression, rebellion and killing between people and communities. Social Darwinists believed that the conflict they believe exists in nature must also be present between human communities and peoples, and that this is the only way in which favored and privileged species and generations can emerge. "Dialectical materialism" was therefore imposed on communities. Under this, a thesis is proposed. There must also be an anti-thesis. When the thesis and anti-thesis clash, the result is a synthesis of the two. The synthesis son becomes a new thesis, and a new anti-thesis to clash with it is produced, and the conflict goes on ad infinitum. Therefore, according to that belief, societies are places in which there needs to be intense conflict. This conflict will give rise to "elimination." When the desired end, the "synthesis," is achieved, fictitious "progress" from the primitive to the more developed will be brought about.
The fascist and communist dictatorships that emerged in the 20th century applied this peculiar Darwinist logic to societies word for word. All fascist and communist dictatorships openly stated that they drew their ideas from those of Darwin as they imposed their brutal and ruthless systems of elimination.
Examples of the horror caused by Darwinist ideology
To the side, Red Army prisoners treated like wild animals by being kept in cages
Admissions by Bloodthirsty 20th-Century Fascist and Communist Dictators That They Drew Their Basic Ideas from Those of Darwin
"In order to disabuse the minds of our seminary students of the myth that the world was created in six days, we had to acquaint ourselves with the geological origin and age of the earth, and be able to prove them in argument; we had to familiarize ourselves with Darwin's teachings." 1
"The foundation of Chinese Socialism rests on Darwin and the theory of evolution." 2
Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx:
From a letter by Engels to Marx: "Darwin, whom I am just now reading, is splendid." 3
Marx's reply to Engels written on 19 December 1860: "… this is the book which contains the basis in natural history for our view." 4
Marx: "Darwin's book is very important and serves me as a basis in natural science for the class struggle in history." 5
In the German edition of his Das Kapital, which he dedicated to Darwin, Marx wrote in his own hand: "To Charles Darwin from a true admirer, from Karl Marx." 6
Engels: "… nature works dialectically and not metaphysically . . . In this connection, Darwin must be named before all others." 7
Engels: "Just as Darwin discovered the law of evolution in organic nature, so Marx discovered the law of evolution in human history." 8
Fascist and communist ideologies that inflicted horror on the world and led to the slaughter of millions drew their ideological foundations from Darwinism. Darwinist logic was installed in people's brains, and they were indoctrinated with the idea that mass slaughter, genocide and persecution are permissible.
Leon Trotsky :
"Darwinism … was the highest triumph of the dialectic in the whole field of organic matter." 9
"What is man? He is by no means a finished or harmonious being. No, he is still a highly awkward creature. Man, as an animal, has not evolved by plan but spontaneously … To produce a new, 'improved version' of man — that is the future task of Communism… Man must look at himself and see himself as a raw material, or at best as a semi-manufactured product…" 10
Adolf Hitler :
"Take away the Nordic Germans and nothing remains but the dance of apes." 11
For the fascist leader Mussolini "... the reluctance of England to engage in war only proved the evolutionary decadence of the British Empire." 12
The idea of superiority among races, ethnicity, nations and classes, and the logic of conflict that resulted, became reality through the application of the false claims of the theory of evolution. People sat back and watched the ruthless genocide and slaughter of millions.
As the words of these bloodthirsty leaders in question, who claimed that nature functioned in a dialectical manner, openly express, they applied the idea of "conflict in nature" directly to human societies. It is clear that Darwinism is the sole reason for the shameless and ruthless bloodshed perpetrated before the eyes of the world by fascist and communist dictatorships in the 20th century. What we shall be concentrating on in this book is not so much fascism as communism, so the way that Darwinist ideology shaped and fed communism shall be dealt with in more detail.
A brief reminder of 20th-century communist barbarity will be useful in realizing what a terrible scourge communism, which draws its strength from Darwinist ideology, truly is.
What Kind of Communist Barbarity Took Place in the 20th Century?
Communist savagery began with the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia in 1917. After the consolidation of the newly established Soviet Union, it spread to Eastern Europe, China, Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Latin American countries, Cuba and Africa.
More than 350 million people lost their lives, directly or indirectly, during or after the two World Wars of the 20th century. One hundred twenty million of these were civilians. The communist savagery that took place in countries may be summarized as follows:
As a result of his devotion to Darwinism, Lenin regarded human beings as simply a species of animal. He therefore had no qualms about using the most repressive ways of dealing with the people under his rule and spreading his terror-based ideas.
The Soviet Union
The Bolshevik revolutionaries shown posing with their weapons in St. Petersburg in November 1917 were all symbols of Lenin's ghastly and vile reign of terror
In the Soviet Union, the Communist Party that grew under Lenin's leadership carried out a revolution using the method of armed struggle and propaganda. In Lenin's time, both units of the Red Army and the secret police organization set up by him, known as the "Cheka," inflicted terror on all parts of society they regarded as being counter-revolutionary. Militants even developed special forms of savagery against the people.
Bolshevik militants, the Cheka secret police and units of the Red Army raided villages all over Russia and began rounding up the harvests of the peasants, who were already living under very difficult conditions, at gunpoint. The result of this policy was terrible famine in the country.
Six million people starved to death because of a famine caused by Stalin, with hundreds of thousands of children falling victim to the disaster.
Those resisting collectivization were shot, and others were sent into exile with their wives and children and the elderly. Many of these people were unable to bear the harsh conditions in exile and died.
The toll of the communist savagery in the time of Lenin and Stalin:
The shooting of tens of thousands of hostages detained without trial and the killing of hundreds of thousands of peasants and workers who rebelled in 1918-1922;
The famine of 1922 leading to the death of 5 million people;
The forced exile of the Cossacks living in the Don region in 1920;
The killing of tens of thousands of people in concentration camps in 1918-1930;
The killing of approximately 690,000 people in the Great Purge of 1937-1938;
The death of 6 million Ukrainians as a result of deliberate famine in 1932-1933; (the famine, known as the Holodomor, was not the result of insufficient crops being produced in the Soviet Union, but rather of the Communist Party refusing to allow crops to be handed out. In other words, this was a deliberate mass slaughter.
The exiling of hundreds of thousands of Poles, Ukrainians, people from the Baltic states, Moldavians and Bessarabians, first in 1939-1941 and then again in 1944-1945;
The exiling of the Volga Germans in 1941;
The sending into exile of the Crimean Tartars in 1944 and their being abandoned to die;
The exiling and abandonment to die of the Ingushetians in 1944.
European countries such as Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Albania and East Germany falling under the control of Stalin's bloody regime in the Soviet period.
As a result of the famine deliberately engineered by Lenin in 1921 and 1922, 29 million inside the Soviet borders faced starvation. Five million of these died for this reason. The total casualties of the communist terror under Lenin and Stalin are terrible indeed.
Chinese communism developed and came to power with the support of Stalin's Russia. But the savagery Red China inflicted on the people was so terrible as to leave even that of Stalin's in the shade.
Political executions were one of the extraordinary measures implemented by the Red Chinese regime. Many people were executed in plain view on the grounds of "deviating from Mao's path."
Communist guerrillas led by Mao Zedong seized control of China in 1949. For China, that meant murder, slaughter, torture, famine, impoverishment, corruption and a terrified, inward-looking society.
Millions of people regarded as exhibiting the slightest negative behavior with regard to communism were considered enemies of communism and arrested for no crime at all, imprisoned, and often killed in public executions in the squares of large cities.
It is estimated that in that period 6 and 10 million people were killed under Mao's directives. Some 20 million people branded as "counter-revolutionaries" spent much of their lives in prison, being treated like animals.
The Tiananmen Square Massacre in June 1989 (around 1,000 dead) is just one example of savagery from China's recent past.
Policies in the field of agriculture resulted in terrible famine and suffering for the people of China. People who opposed these policies were punished by forced starvation. The death rate from famine in some villages exceeded 50%. The number of people dying from starvation in that period is estimated at around 40 million.
The Dalai Lama, who directed the Tibetan resistance to China for many years, described the savagery inflicted on his people by Chinese communism as follows:
"Tibetans not only were shot, but also were beaten to death, crucified, burned alive, drowned, mutilated, starved, strangled, hanged, boiled alive, buried alive, drawn and quartered, and beheaded." 13
The Uighur Turks were subjected to systematic genocide after Mao came to power in 1949. China carried out nuclear tests in the Uighur Autonomous regions with no safety precautions being taken. As a result of these nuclear tests there was a huge rise in cancer rates among the Uighur Turks and many children were born handicapped or dead.
Uighur Turks were forbidden to have more than one child in East Turkestan. The children of those who disobeyed were killed inside their mothers' wombs. As a result of the policy of assimilation pursued since 1953, Muslims who represented 75% of the population in the Uighur Autonomous region now represent only 35%. East Turkestan Muslims, with a population of some 25 million are still subjected to Chinese persecution today.
Red China became the scene of the worst communist savagery and slaughter. Communist publications, however, played host to deceitful communist propaganda, as if they could cover that horror up. Pictures of happy people holding flowers and supporting the regime, happy peasants with copies of the "Little Red Book" (properly, Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-Tung), smiling soldiers and workers side by side with peasants living in peace, and a happy Mao listening to the problems of workers and peasants was intended to propagate a vast lie to the world. The truth behind these pictures of happiness was in fact most terrible.
The reality of communism is very different to that of the false picture in communist publications. People were slaughtered en masse for no reason and executed wherever they were.
The propaganda of a happy people in communist publications is a huge lie. Mao's time was one of horror, when a large part of the people of China starved to death, when professors, artists, statesmen and writers condemned as "bourgeois" were humiliated in public, had insulting placards hung round their necks and were executed.
The Black Book of Communism, a book put together by a team of historians in which the crimes committed under the name of communism were collected together, describes the savagery of communism in China as follows:
The whole people were invited to public trials of "counterrevolutionaries," who almost invariably were condemned to death. Everyone participated in the executions, shouting out ""kill, kill"" to the Red Guards whose task it was to cut victims into pieces. Sometimes the pieces were cooked and eaten, or force-fed to members of the victim's family who were still alive and looking on. Everyone was then invited to a banquet, where the liver and heart of the former landowner were shared out, and to meetings where a speaker would address rows of severed heads freshly skewered on stakes. This fascination for vengeful cannibalism, which later became common under the Pol Pot regime, echoes a very ancient East Asian archetype that appears often at cataclysmic moments of Chinese history. 14
Pol Pot, the ruthless Khmer Rouge leader and murderer of 3 million Cambodians
The communist Khmer Rouge came to power in April 1975 under the leadership of a fanatical Maoist called Pol Pot (his real name was Saloth Sar) and emptied out all towns and cities.
The Khmer Rouge regime is regarded as the apex of communist genocide.
One of the worst mass slaughters in the world took place under Pol Pot's regime. Between 1975 and 1979 alone, some 3.3 million people out of a total population of 9 million were killed by being shot in the head, suffocated by having plastic bags put over their heads, pickaxe blows to the head or starvation.
Under Pol Pot's rule, the party decided that for the sake of the country, the only duty of a communist was to work to death in the rice paddies, and it duly forced the entire population of Cambodia to work in the rice paddies. Tens of thousands of city-dwellers – politicians, civil servants, teachers and intellectuals – were exiled to the countryside and forced to labor on collective farms under terribly harsh conditions.
Shirking, eating even a tiny piece of produce without permission or performing any religious observance were regarded as "counter-revolutionary activities," and under that pretext, killing at the level of almost one person a minute was initiated. At least one member of every family lost their lives during this slaughter.
People who spoke more than one language, those who were doctors or teachers, or even those who could simply read or wore eyeglasses were tortured and slaughtered as "parasite intellectuals" or "under the influence of depraved foreign cultures."
Under the Pol Pot regime, people to be killed were executed with a bullet to the head at first; however, it was later decided that this was a waste of bullets and more barbaric methods were employed.
The Khmer Rouge regime finally came to an end when the Vietnamese launched the invasion of Cambodia in 1979. In order to expose the savagery of the previous regime, the Vietnamese dug up the rice paddies, known as the "killing fields," produced the bodies and put them on display.
The Communist Khmer Rouge numbered some of the people they executed and took pictures of them. These photographs are of Cambodians taken before their execution.
Thousands of mass graves have been found in the "killing fields" of the Khmer Rouge. The bones to the side are those of Cambodians suffocated to death by having plastic bags placed over their heads. Cambodia experienced the very worst of communist barbarity.
The Red barbarism in Asia was by no means limited to China and Cambodia; the communist regimes in North Korea have also inflicted a ruthless terror on their own people. The "Juche" (Juche meaning "spirit of self-reliance" or "independent stand") doctrine, even more ruthless than Mao's policies, was implemented in the country.
Falls in production, famine and mass deaths have taken place because of communist agricultural policies. It is estimated that some 2 million people starved to death in North Korea in the 1990s, though the true figure may have been as high as 4 million. While the people starve, spending on the military, ballistic missiles and the nation's pursuit of nuclear weapons continues to consume the country's resources.
Though very little is known about the internal life of the country beyond what their carefully managed propaganda and state media chooses to release to the wider world, there are the testimonies of those who have defected and speak of horrors such as "Camp 22", officially Penal Labor Colony #22, a concentration camp in North Hamgyong Province, where the inmates, sometimes whole families, are isolated, forced to work all day regardless of weather conditions, systematically starved and abused, and frequently executed or tortured to death. There are also disturbing testimonies of medical experimentation similar to that practiced by the Nazis at Auschwitz.
The Red barbarity in Asia was not limited to China and Cambodia; communist regimes in North Korea and Vietnam also inflicted ruthless terror on their own peoples. The number of people murdered by the North Korean regime under the decades of dictatorship by Kim Il Sung has been out at 1.5 million.
Communist barbarity spread to many countries during the Second World War and after. Genocide, executions, famine and hunger in countries that fell into the hands of communism cost the lives of millions. The toll from the communist savagery that spread to Europe, Asia, the Far East and even South America was very high. These historical facts show us once again that the true objective of communism is world domination. This perverse ideology that inflicted terror on the 20th century is still alive today. And its aim now, instead of the failed communist initiatives of the 20th century, is to be able to establish a more comprehensive communist dominion to rule the entire world.
Bloody Communist Leaders Believed in Their Savagery as a Requirement of Communist Ideology
No communist has ever admitted that this balance sheet of horror in communist countries was a mistake. Savagery is a requirement of communism. Pol Pot, who killed 3.3 million people, thought that when he said on his deathbed in 1998, "My conscience is clear." Bloodthirsty communist leaders have always been proud of the savagery and slaughter they committed because they always think they are serving communist ideology by killing, destroying, creating famines and plundering the state treasuries. They invariably have this Darwinist ideology in their minds that tells them that their actions are legitimate. One can clearly see this in the communists' own words:
Under the leadership of the bloody communist Pol Pot, Cambodia suffered the most appalling slaughter. Forced to labor in the paddy fields, the populace was constantly exposed to savagery. Writers, professors, artists and scientists were brutally murdered in these killing fields. The time when an estimated one third of the population of Cambodia was slaughtered is that of the bloody communist Pol Pot.
"They must arm themselves as best they can (rifles, revolvers, bombs, knives, knuckle-dusters, sticks, rags soaked in kerosene for starting fires, ropes or rope ladders, shovels for building barricades, pyroxylin cartridges, barbed wire, nails, etc., etc.). …
Even without arms, the groups can play a most important part: 1) by leading the mass; 2) BY ATTACKING, WHENEVER A FAVOURABLE OPPORTUNITY PRESENTS ITSELF, POLICEMEN . . . AND SEIZING THEIR ARMS; 3) BY RESCUING THE ARRESTED OR INJURED, WHEN THERE ARE ONLY FEW POLICE ABOUT; 4) BY GETTING ON TO THE ROOFS OR UPPER STOREYS OF HOUSES, ETC., AND SHOWERING STONES OR POURING BOILING WATER ON THE TROOPS, ETC. …
… TO LAUNCH ATTACKS UNDER FAVOURABLE CIRCUMSTANCES IS NOT ONLY EVERY REVOLUTIONARY'S RIGHT, BUT HIS PLAIN DUTY. THE KILLING OF SPIES, POLICEMEN, GENDARMES, THE BLOWING UP OF POLICE STATIONS, THE LIBERATION OF PRISONERS, THE SEIZURE OF GOVERNMENT FUNDS FOR THE NEEDS OF THE UPRISING. . . every detachment of the revolutionary army must be ready to start such operations at a moment's notice." 15
"The propagandists must supply each group with brief and simple recipes for making bombs… Squads must at once begin military training by launching operations immediately, at once. SOME MAY AT ONCE UNDERTAKE TO KILL A SPY OR BLOW UP A POLICE STATION, OTHERS TO RAID A BANK TO CONFISCATE FUNDS FOR THE INSURRECTION…" 16
Abdullah Öcalan engaging in mass propaganda accompanied by Communist Party flags, just like his teacher, Lenin
"WE CANNOT REJECT TERROR, AS IT IS THE ONE FORM OF MILITARY ACTION WHICH MAY BE PERFECTLY SUITABLE OR EVEN ESSENTIAL AT A DEFINITE JUNCTURE IN BATTLE." 17
"... WHEN PEOPLE CHARGE US WITH HARSHNESS we wonder how they can forget the rudiments of Marxism." 18
"… WE ARE NOT AT ALL OPPOSED TO POLITICAL KILLING … Only in direct, immediate connection with the mass movement can and must individual terrorist acts be of value." 19
"When I see Social-Democrats proudly and smugly declaring 'we are not anarchists, thieves, robbers, we are superior to all this, we reject guerrilla warfare',—I ask myself: DO THESE PEOPLE REALISE WHAT THEY ARE SAYING? Armed clashes and conflicts between the Black-Hundred government and the population are taking place all over the country. THIS IS AN ABSOLUTELY INEVITABLE PHENOMENON AT THE PRESENT STAGE OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE REVOLUTION." 20
"You cannot do anything without rousing the masses to action. … WE CAN'T EXPECT TO GET ANYWHERE UNLESS WE RESORT TO TERRORISM: SPECULATORS MUST BE SHOT ON THE SPOT." 21
THE PKK APPLIES LENINIST, STALINIST AND MARXIST GUERRILLA TACTICS TO THE LETTER
1. Bugün, 26.11.2011, ("100,000 people may die. The number is unimportant.")
2.Türkiye, 19.10.2011, (Mine trap for the police in Bitlis: 8 martyred, including 3 civilians)
3. Zaman, 20.04.2012, (Öcalan's order for "500 soldiers to be killed every day")
4.Sabah, 07.07.2010 (Police station targeted again)
5. Zaman, 29.09.2011, (The PKK member Bahoz's order: So long as one police officer dies, 50 civilians are not important)
6.Yeni Akit, 30.16.2011, (The police are the PKK's new target)
"In reality, the state is nothing but a machine for the suppression of one class by another. Dictatorship is rule based directly on force and unrestricted by any laws. The revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat is RULE WON AND MAINTAINED THROUGH THE USE OF VIOLENCE BY THE PROLETARIAT AGAINST THE BOURGEOISIE, RULE THAT IS UNRESTRICTED BY ANY LAWS." 22
"THE PHENOMENON IN WHICH WE ARE INTERESTED IS THE ARMED STRUGGLE. It is conducted by individuals and by small groups. Some belong to revolutionary organizations, while others (the majority in certain parts of Russia) do not belong to any revolutionary organization. Armed struggle pursues two different aims, which must be strictly distinguished: IN THE FIRST PLACE, THIS STRUGGLE AIMS AT ASSASSINATING INDIVIDUALS, CHIEFS AND SUBORDINATES IN THE ARMY AND POLICE; IN THE SECOND PLACE, IT AIMS AT THE CONFISCATION OF MONETARY FUNDS BOTH FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND FROM PRIVATE PERSONS." 23
1. Zaman, 24.11.2011,(Öcalan's chaos plan order: the KCK must encourage tens of thousands to rise up)
2. Sabah, 14.01.2011,(The PKK has pressed the button and the Southeast is in disorder)
3. Bugün, 18.08.2010,(PKK threat to opinion formers)
"The emancipation of the oppressed class is impossible NOT ONLY WITHOUT A VIOLENT REVOLUTION, but also without the destruction of the apparatus of state power which was created by the ruling class." 24
"The proletariat must carry to completion the democratic revolution, BY ALLYING TO ITSELF THE MASS OF THE PEASANTRY IN ORDER TO CRUSH BY FORCE THE RESISTANCE OF THE AUTOCRACY and to paralyse the instability of the bourgeoisie. The proletariat must accomplish the socialist revolution, by allying to itself the mass of the semi-proletarian elements of the population IN ORDER TO CRUSH BY FORCE THE RESISTANCE OF THE BOURGEOISIE AND TO PARALYSE THE INSTABILITY OF THE PEASANTRY AND THE PETTY BOURGEOISIE." 25
COMMUNISM SURVIVES THROUGH TERROR
Communism thrives on terror. Bloodshed and terror are the only path in communism. In spreading their own ideologies, the bloody communist leaders of the 20th century constantly emphasized that terror, cunning attacks, propaganda and guerrilla tactics were an essential condition of communism and implemented them accordingly. Therefore, criticizing the acts of terror perpetrated by the communist PKK terror organization as it enters the big cities, martyrs civilians and attacks workers and the police, or condemning them in the press under captions such as "cowardly" or "treacherous" will merely give this communist terror organization the impression it is achieving its aims. The PKK is currently applying the requirements of Stalinist-Leninist ideology to the very letter.
1. Taraf, 30.10.2011 (Civilians struck again)
2. Yeni Akit, 05.06.2011(PKK threat to the Kurds: We will burn your hearth and homes)
3. Sabah, 16.07.2012 (The bomber detonated it, knowing it was in a child's hand)
4. Taraf, 30.10.2011 (Living bomb horror)
5. Vatan, 10.11.2011(The PKK's new trap – sensor bombs)
Communist terror seeks to spread fear among people and to slaughter as many as possible, regardless of whether they are women or children. With its terrorist actions, the PKK is fulfilling this requirement of communism. Terror will not be eliminated until the communist mindset is done away with.
6. Aydınlık, 21.05.2012 (PKK kills a laborer)
7. Zaman, 28.09.2011(Same PKK, same violence)
8. Bugün, 19.10.2011 (They martyred a father, his 2 children and 5 police officers with a bomb: VILE AMBUSH)
9. Star, 12.11.2011 (Members of the PKK terror organization snatch a sea bus)
10. Turkiye, 19.07.2012 (PKK members start prison fire)
11. Yeni Akit, 09.02.2011(PKK Nerons arrested)
12. Cihan Haber, 12.07.2012 (PKK burns ambushed vehicle)
"A revolution is not a dinner party, or writing an essay, or painting a picture, or doing embroidery; it cannot be so refined, so leisurely and gentle, so temperate, kind, courteous, restrained and magnanimous. A REVOLUTION IS AN INSURRECTION, AN ACT OF VIOLENCE BY WHICH ONE CLASS OVERTHROWS ANOTHER." 26
Leon Trotsky :
"The question as to who is to rule the country, i.e., of the life or death of the bourgeoisie, WILL BE DECIDED on either side, not by references to the paragraphs of the constitution, but BY THE EMPLOYMENT OF ALL FORMS OF VIOLENCE. … THE RED TERROR IS A WEAPON UTILIZED AGAINST A CLASS, DOOMED TO DESTRUCTION, WHICH DOES NOT WISH TO PERISH." 27
"… the revolution does require of the revolutionary class that it should attain its end by all methods at its disposal – IF NECESSARY, BY AN ARMED RISING; IF REQUIRED, BY TERRORISM." 28
Joseph Stalin :
"Can such a radical transformation of the old bourgeois order be achieved WITHOUT A VIOLENT REVOLUTION, WITHOUT THE DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT?" 29
"To think that such a revolution can be carried out PEACEFULLY, within the framework of bourgeois democracy, which is adapted to the rule of the bourgeoisie, MEANS THAT ONE HAS EITHER GONE OUT OF ONE'S MIND AND LOST NORMAL HUMAN UNDERSTANDING, OR HAS GROSSLY AND OPENLY REPUDIATED THE PROLETARIAN REVOLUTION." 30
Che Guevara :
"This means a long war. And, once more we repeat it, a cruel war. LET NO ONE FOOL HIMSELF AT THE OUTSTART AND LET NO ONE HESITATE TO START OUT for fear of the consequences it may bring to his people. IT IS ALMOST OUR SOLE HOPE FOR VICTORY." 31
"My Marxism has taken root and become purified. I BELIEVE IN ARMED STRUGGLE … , AND I AM CONSISTENT WITH MY BELIEFS." 32
"All the oligarchies' powers of repression, all their capacity for BRUTALITY AND DEMAGOGUERY will be placed at the service of their cause. Our mission, in the first hour, shall be to survive; later, WE SHALL FOLLOW THE PERENNIAL EXAMPLE OF THE GUERILLA, CARRYING OUT ARMED PROPAGANDA … THE GREAT LESSON OF THE INVINCIBILITY OF THE GUERRILLAS TAKING ROOT IN THE DISPOSSESSED MASSES. The galvanizing of the national spirit, the preparation for harder tasks, for resisting even more violent repressions. Hatred as an element of the struggle; a relentless hatred of the enemy, impelling us over and beyond the natural limitations that man is heir to and TRANSFORMING HIM INTO AN EFFECTIVE, VIOLENT, SELECTIVE AND COLD KILLING MACHINE. Our soldiers must be thus; a people without hatred cannot vanquish a brutal enemy." 33
"We must carry the war into every corner the enemy happens to carry it: TO HIS HOME, TO HIS CENTERS OF ENTERTAINMENT; A TOTAL WAR. IT IS NECESSARY TO PREVENT HIM FROM HAVING A MOMENT OF PEACE, A QUIET MOMENT OUTSIDE HIS BARRACKS OR EVEN INSIDE; WE MUST ATTACK HIM WHEREVER HE MAY BE, MAKE HIM FEEL LIKE A CORNERED BEAST WHEREVER HE MAY MOVE. Then HIS MORAL FIBER SHALL BEGIN TO DECLINE. He will even become more beastly, but we shall notice how the signs of decadence begin to appear." 34
The savagery of the 20th century, which everyone sat back and watched, has still not lost its essential mindset. Terror and slaughter will continue so long as the communist threat persists. Therefore, what needs to be eradicated is not those who hold the idea, but the idea itself.
Pol Pot :
"IN CONFORMITY WITH MARXIST-LENINIST PRINCIPLES, IT IS NECESSARY TO …. REDUCE PROGRESSIVELY THIS DEFECT WHICH IS THE STATE UNTIL IT IS EXTINGUISHED COMPLETELY, giving place to [a system of] self-management of factories by the proletariat and of agriculture by the peasants." 35
That is communist savagery. Communist ideology as summed up in the bloodthirsty communist leaders' own words: a system of barbarity,
that seeks to leave not a moment of peace,
that turns human beings into effective, violent and cold killing machines,
that applies terror as a principle,
that believes that anyone opposing the revolution must have a bullet put in his head,
that survives through the violence committed against the bourgeoisie by the proletariat,
that is unrestricted by any law,
that regards it as essential to kill leaders, soldiers and the police,
that seized their financial resources,
that imposes red terror against a class "doomed to destruction,"
that believes the only way to achieve its aim is through armed insurrection and terror,
that describes those who think the aim can be achieved through peaceful means as having "lost their senses" or having abandoned communist principles,
that makes it essential for the military not to be given a moment's peace, inside or outside their barracks,
and that seeks to totally destroy the state.
These were not just words. Bloodthirsty communist leaders have applied this savagery they described in the passages quoted above before the eyes of the entire world. This scenario is no imaginary one. People who regard all human beings, themselves included, as a more advanced species of animal and who believe that the supposed conflict in nature also needs to be applied to human societies implemented the savagery described above in an even more extreme manner. Their ideology convinced them that what they were doing was not only right but also absolutely necessary. This perverse ideology created a belief and purpose in their brains. They never hesitated for a moment when it came to this mass slaughter, which they perpetrated for the sake of this belief which they had transformed into nothing less than a false religion. Communist barbarity is a cause of fear and horror for the great majority of people, but for a communist it is essential and something that simply had to be acted on.
Communism, developed and prepared by the Darwinist mindset, is truly a barbaric ideology. For that reason, it is impossible to prevent such mass slaughter without shattering this false belief system in a communist's brain. There is just about no other way of convincing a communist of the illogicality of the savagery he espouses apart from convincing him scientifically of the invalidity of Darwinism. The reason for our consideration of past communist slaughter here is to be able to show that, given the opportunity, the communist barbarity they seek to apply in the southeast of Turkey will be no different because the terrorist and communist PKK draws its strength from the same intellectual foundation, Darwinism. We shall be looking at this in detail in later chapters.
Bloody Communist Leaders Reject Religion, The State and The Family
Since communism is based on Darwinism, it shares all the characteristics of the polluted morality that the Darwinist ideology imposes on people and communities. In the same way that communist savagery and barbarity are founded on Darwinism, it also draws its irreligious nature and way of regarding the state, the family and moral virtues as bad things from that same Darwinism. The theory of evolution, which takes chance as its false deity and was launched solely for the purpose of denying the existence of Almighty God (surely God is beyond that), represents, in Marx's words, "...the basis in natural history" for communism. Therefore, both ideologies serve the same aim. It is of course impossible for a Darwinist who believes that chance is a creative force (surely God is beyond that) to believe in God. And a communist absorbs all these perverse ideas and applies them with no compunction whatsoever.
Communist ideology, which maintains that "Man came into being by chance and is an unfettered animal," will also seek to spread irreligion in all those regions in which it disseminates communism. Since a communist society recognizes no religion, it will also not recognize moral values, the family, moral virtues or the existence of the state. As we shall be seeing in more detail in due course, it is a complete waste of time to invite someone with a communist mindset to have a conscience, recognize moral virtues, the warmth of the family, love or compassion and to be forgiving, or to criticize anything that he may do.
We can see the kind of irreligious environment, far removed from any kind of spirituality, that communism seeks to impose from the words of bloodthirsty communist leaders:
Quotes from Bloody Communist Leaders Showing Their Opposition to Religion and Religious Moral Values (Surely God is beyond this)
Vladimir Ilich Lenin:
"Religion is one of the forms of spiritual oppression …" 36
"… any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, … for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful 'infection'." 37
"There can be nothing more abominable than religion." 38
"We must combat religion—that is the ABC of all materialism, and consequently of Marxism." 39
"… to be an atheist, which every socialist is, …" 40
"Even the bare mention of a citizen's religion in official documents should unquestionably be eliminated. No subsidies should be granted to the established church nor state allowances made to ecclesiastical and religious societies." 41
"The philosophical basis of Marxism, as Marx and Engels repeatedly declared, is dialectical materialism … —a materialism which is absolutely atheistic and positively hostile to all religion." 42
"Religion is the opium of the people—this dictum by Marx is the corner-stone of the whole Marxist outlook on religion." 43
"Marxism is materialism. As such, it is as relentlessly hostile to religion …" 44
"Our program necessarily includes the propaganda of atheism." 45
"Our Party is an association of class-conscious, advanced fighters for the emancipation of the working class. Such an association cannot and must not be indifferent to lack of class-consciousness, ignorance or obscurantism in the shape of religious beliefs. We demand complete disestablishment of the Church so as to be able to combat the religious fog with purely ideological and solely ideological weapons, by means of our press and by word of mouth. But we founded our association, the Russian Social-Democratic Labour Party, precisely for such a struggle against every religious bamboozling of the workers. And to us the ideological struggle is not a private affair, but the affair of the whole Party, of the whole proletariat." 46
"For Germany, the criticism of religion has been essentially completed, and the criticism of religion is the prerequisite of all criticism." 47
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness." 48
"Man makes religion, religion does not make man. … This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world." 49
Joseph Stalin :
"Then Devil is with us, and together we will win." (In response to Churchill's "God is with us", during WW2) 50
"We carry on and will continue to carry on propaganda against religious prejudices. … The Party cannot be neutral towards religion and does conduct anti-religious propaganda against all and every religious prejudice…" 51
Nikita Khrushchev: (Secretary General of the Soviet Communist Party, 1953)
"Communism has not changed its attitude of opposition to religion. We are doing everything we can to eliminate the bewitching power of the opium of religion." 52
THE PKK'S VIEW OF RELIGIOUS MORAL VALUES IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THAT OF BLOODY LENINIST, STALINIST, MARXIST, COMMUNIST LEADERS
SURELY GOD AND ISLAM ARE BEYOND THIS
1. Zaman, 20.03.2011 (Ideology of "The PKK is my god" imposed in organization camp)
2. Yeni Akit, 23.04.2011 (Islam is the main threat for us!)
3. Yeni Akit, 07.06.2011 (Apo thinks prayer is a show)
4. Yeni Akit, 19.09.2011 (PKK burns 4 mosques)
5. Vakit, 18.08.2010 (Clergymen are the PKK's new targets)
6. Zaman, 07.06.2011 (The PKK is against religion and does not want young people to believe)
7. Zaman, 30.04.2011 (PKK uneasy at devout Kurds)
8. Yeni Akit, 08.15.2011 (The PKK's problem is with religion)
9. Vakit, 08.09.2010 (Imams are the new target of the atheist PKK)
10. Tercüman, 02.11.2007 (PKK traitors are stealing our children's faith)
Quotations from Bloody Communist Leaders About the Lack of Need for the State
Communism represents a huge threat because of its perverted view of God, the Divine religions and Holy books and religious morality. In the same way that communism is inimical to religion and spiritual values, so it does not believe in the state. Communist thinking employs a concept of "oppressed peoples" invented by itself. Communist thinking portrays itself as the supposed liberator of those oppressed by the bourgeoisie. According to their nonsensical view, the state must only exist on a temporary basis, following which all the resources of the state must belong to the communist system. Indeed, communism seeks world domination and is based on the elimination of national boundaries and thus of states. Communism's aim is a communist world state.
Communist leaders' words on this subject are crystal clear:
From a lecture delivered by Lenin at the Sverdlov University;
Vladimir Ilich Lenin:
Communist ideology is opposed to the state and to state institutions. They frequently use this in their ideological propaganda, and seek to impose the idea on the masses.
"The doctrine of the state SERVES TO JUSTIFY SOCIAL PRIVILEGE, THE EXISTENCE OF EXPLOITATION, THE EXISTENCE OF CAPITALISM…"
"IT [THE STATE] APPEARS WHEREVER AND WHENEVER A DIVISION OF SOCIETY INTO CLASSES APPEARS, WHENEVER EXPLOITERS AND EXPLOITED APPEAR."
"… a certain apparatus of coercion, an apparatus of violence, such as is represented at the present time, as you all realise, by armed contingents of troops, prisons and other means of subjugating the will of others by force—all that which constitutes THE ESSENCE OF THE STATE."
"THE STATE IS A MACHINE FOR MAINTAINING THE RULE OF ONE CLASS OVER ANOTHER."
"And WE SHALL PLACE THIS MACHINE IN THE HANDS OF THE CLASS THAT IS TO OVERTHROW THE POWER OF CAPITAL. We shall reject all the old prejudices about the state meaning universal equality—for that is a fraud: as long as there is exploitation there cannot be equality. … THEN THERE WILL BE NO STATE AND NO EXPLOITATION. Such is the view of our Communist Party." 53
Quotations from Bloody Communist Leaders Regarding the Need to Abolish the Concept of the Family
In the same way, for a communist the family is a concept that should never exist. Communists regard familiar relations as feudal relationships (a local, hierarchical relationship between the protected and the protector). It is the construction of a small, nuclear unit instead of a broad community. When the concept of the family enters the equation, communists claim that the individual loses his priority values, abandons the broad community he serves and seeks instead to further the interests of his family. For that reason, according to communism, and as set out mostly in the writings of Engels, the institution of the family must be done away with altogether. The concept of the family is expressed as follows in communism:
"Revolutionary elements who marry, establish a family or are part of a family, for whatever reason, are in a state of contradiction." 54
The first thing that Pol Pot did, for example, was to split families up, since he regarded them as an obstacle to communist objectives. By forcing people to live in communes, he kept family members apart from one another and attempted to eliminate the very concept of the family.
The same thing was done by Stalin in Russia. Peasants' lands were first taken away. Then great care was taken that the small plots they were given back should be scattered and far away from one another. As a result, family members were forced to live in different places in order to work their lands consisting of very small plots. Declarations were made that stated "...the revolution will remain weak so long as family ties and the concept of the family survive," at meetings of the Communist Party, and indoctrination was conducted along that line.
That is the terrifying and barbaric view of social life that a communist will hold. For a communist, words about virtue and moral values are meaningless.
Since a communist rejects the concept of the state, he will also disregard the laws of that state. He cannot be won over with the concept of the family; sentimental approaches such as "return to your family" or "go home to your mother" will never have any impact on a terrorist. For a communist, moral values, the state and the concept of the family are meaningless. Therefore, neither state laws, nor calls to moral virtue nor the family will have any effect in stopping a communist. In order to stop a communist, the intellectual system that made all these concepts so worthless has itself to be eliminated. That means the Darwinist, materialist, Stalinist and communist intellectual system.
Stalin's aim of "... conduct[ing] antireligious propaganda against all and every religious prejudice…" is a method espoused and applied by all communist movements today. The dream of communism is to be able to produce irreligious, anti-spiritual and ruthless societies in which children are killed, people made wretched and the concept of the family abolished
SINCE THE PKK'S VIEW OF THE FAMILY CONCEPT IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS THAT OF BLOODY LENINIST, STALINIST, MARXIST, COMMUNIST LEADERS, IT IS MEANINGLESS TO CALL ON THEM TO "RETURN TO THEIR HOMES"
1. Yeni Akit, 08.06.2011 (PKK again burn a child!)
2. Türkiye, 01.01.2011 (The PKK kidnaps children and turns them into militants)
3. Vatan, 11.11.2011 (Wicked types throw Molotov cocktail at a baby)
4. Bugün, 28.09.2011 (Pregnant woman hit by 200 bullets)
5. Türkiye, 01.01.2011 (The PKK has snatched 700 children in Diyarbakır!)
6. Zaman, 26.04.2011 (The PKK demand money for returning to his family the body of a terrorist they killed and burned)
7. Zaman, 01.10.2011(Ballistic tests reveal the PKK killed mother and 2 children)
8. Bugün, 26.09.2011 (Cowardly trap)
9. Yeni Akit, 25.11.2011 ("Burn children" command from Öcalan)
10. Sabah, 18.09.2010 (The PKK are always baby-killers)
11. Zaman, 28.10.2011 (They gave young people drugs in the Kurdish Language Association and made them attack the police)
Analyses By Mr. Adnan Oktar Broadcast on A9 TV – 2
Öcalan will never regret being a Marxist or renounce Marxist thinking. He will never regret what he has done
DİDEM ÜRER: Our Hodja Ahmet Taşgetiren has said that Öcalan has undergone a huge change and decided on a democratic unitary state, and that Öcalan has personally stated this. Ahmet Taşgetiren went on to say that because of his change of mind, Öcalan had abandoned his idea of an independent state and of democratic autonomy, but that the time has now come for him to apologize. He then said, "Öcalan has undergone a change of mind, but he led 40,000 people into the flames before that happened. I am disgusted by the way that such people come to their senses after thousands of people have lost their lives, after the passage of many years, and under their leadership."
ADNAN OKTAR: Anti-Darwinist and anti-materialist education are essential. Abdullah Öcalan will not renounce his Marxist way of thinking. Solely because he is unhappy in prison, he now thinks that he can send messages that people will find pleasing. He thinks that he can gain sympathy in that way. Abdullah Öcalan included, nobody who has had an intensive Marxist education will renounce Marxism and will never repent of their past deeds. He should be sorry for being a Marxist and in order to be sorry he needs to have faith; in order for him to have faith, he must not be a Darwinist-materialist. That is very hard. (January 17th, 2013, A9 TV)
The PKK is the fanatical army of the alleged terror organization Ergenekon. What it fears most is the enlightenment of the people.
ADNAN OKTAR: PKK communists act hand in hand with the alleged terror organization Ergenekon. The alleged terror organization Ergenekon is the founder of that devilish and satanic organization known as the PKK. The alleged terror organization Ergenekon planned this as far back as the 1970s. It brought the PKK out in the 1980s. It has always used the PKK as its bloody puppet. They have martyred our troops and police. They are still doing it. They think they can now enjoy a bit of rest and recuperation.
What the PKK, its ferocious army of killers, fears most is the enlightenment of the people. That is why they attack schools. They attack exhibitions. They attack libraries. They burn books. They thus try to prevent people from learning the truth. But they cannot possibly succeed. They have panicked in the face of the way that people have recently come to see the invalidity of Darwinism and materialism because the collapse of Darwinism means the collapse of the PKK's entire system. That is why the PKK thinks it is being very clever by sending hired killers, the alleged terror organization Ergenekon's leftovers, to attack places where people can be enlightened. They attack libraries and burn cars; there is no disgrace they do not perpetrate. They foolishly imagine they can in this way prevent people becoming enlightened. Yet, quite the contrary, and thanks be to God, such activities are continuing apace, with a huge rise in fervor. Things are increasing in multiples of 10, insha'Allah. (January 2nd, 2013; A9 TV)
The PKK will not lay down its arms without being intellectually defeated. There needs to be propaganda against all ideas that might damage the structure of the nation.
DİDEM ÜRER: The British daily The Guardian has referred to the İmralı process and suggested that "The PKK will lay down its arms in a matter of days." The paper said that if the process is successful, the PKK will turn its weapons over to Mesut Barzani in Erbil.
ADNAN OKTAR: Well, let us see them lay their weapons down. There will be no lying down of arms or anything until they are intellectually defeated because their intellectual campaign is continuing. This campaign waged by the communists is far more effective than the armed struggle. Their intellectual campaign is continuing. They are continuing to spread their ideas and propaganda. The PKK and the deputies from the BDP have embraced one another this time, and even that is a major propaganda coup. Intensive propaganda is going on. And scientific and artistic propaganda is also going on in all of Europe. There is scientific propaganda in Greece, Syria, Russia and everywhere. Marxist propaganda and Darwinist-Materialist propaganda are still continuing. What Turkey is doing is to tell young people about Darwinism and materialism. That is all Turkey is doing. It is not making any counter-propaganda; they do not even want to speak of it. They never say, "Counter-propaganda, scientific propaganda is needed." Do you ever hear anyone say, "There needs to be scientific propaganda against the PKK"? Maybe sometimes in the most veiled of terms, along the lines of, "Various social responses need to be made to them" but never anything explicit. This needs to be explained explicitly. The state needs to have its own relevant unit. Counter-propaganda. There could be a relevant directorate even. There needs to be all kinds of propaganda activities aimed against all ideas that might damage our national structure. If this is not done, then there is something wrong. (February 9th, 2013; A9 TV)
"The PKK is the religion of the antichrist and the exact opposite of Islam. There is currently a struggle between these two diametrically opposed faiths."
DİDEM ÜRER: "One of those accused on charges of taking part in PKK and KCK activities made a statement concerning the kind of ideological education they use to win students over to the organization. He said that provinces have their PKK educational institutions, that students arriving from the East and Southeast are exposed to terror organization propaganda in these institutions and that after completing their theoretical training, they are then given practical training up in the mountains."
ADNAN OKTAR: These are not hollow men of straw. They are cultured and well read. They have examined and believe in Marx and Stalin and Lenin, the lives of all the Marxist guerrilla leaders and materialist philosophy. Because this is a religion, the religion of the antichrist and the system of the antichrist. The antichrist appeared in the form of Darwin, but that perverse religion has its own sects and priests. There is Marx and Lenin and Stalin, for instance. That religion has its own rituals and places of worship. They stage their show parades, for instance. Those are their acts of worship. It has its flags and pictures, and there are religious observances.
That religion has its laws. For example, while it is a sin to kill in Islam, in that religion it is lawful and useful. While destruction is unlawful in Islam, in that religion it is lawful and useful. The family is sacred, but not in that religion. It recognizes no families. Moral values are sacred in Islam, but no such values are recognized in that faith; they are regarded as simply a man-made institution. Personal property is permitted in Islam, but not in that religion, which harbors the belief that property belongs to all. Therefore, that religion is the exact opposite of everything that Islam says. Since it is the religion of satan, it has its own satanic rituals. Since they have given themselves up to satan, as Almighty God says, "We assign him a satan who becomes his bosom friend" (Surat az-Zukhruf, 36) – He says, "And We have assigned them (devils as) intimate companions (in this world), so they have made fair-seeming to them what is between their hands (i.e., in front of them) and what is behind them (i.e., , what awaits them);" (Surat al-Fussilat, 25) Once people have entered that mindset, satan is all round them like a shell and they become impervious to religion, Islam and the Qur'an.
In one verse Almighty God says; We created many of the jinn and mankind for Hell. They have hearts they do not understand with. They have eyes they do not see with. They have ears they do not hear with. Such people are like cattle. No, they are even further astray! They are the unaware. (Surat al-A'raf, 179)
Someone who undergoes PKK education, a member of the organization, literally becomes crazy because he has entered the religion of satan. For example, in their perverse faith, may God forbid, killing is lawful, killing other people is lawful. Killing oneself or others is a sin in Islam. These two are diametrically opposed faiths. There is currently a struggle between these two diametrically opposed faiths but our Southeastern brothers are unaware that they are under siege by the antichrist. The antichrist approaches them pleasantly, in a manner appropriate to them. For example, the antichrist says, "I will give you mountains of food and mountains of water and mountains of broth and mountains of meat; I promise you paradise."
"THE ANTICHRIST WILL BE ACCOMPANIED BY MOUNTAINS OF BREAD AND MEAT, AND WILL HAVE RIVERS OF WATER..." (Portents of Doomsday, Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Rasul al-Barzanji, Pamuk Press, Trans. Naim Erdoğan p. 214)
"THE ANTICHRIST WILL HAVE WITH HIM A MOUNTAIN OF BROTH, HOT MEAT THAT NEVER COOLS, A FLOWING RIVER, a forest made of green gardens and a mountain of smoke and fire... He will say this is my paradise and that is my hell... THIS IS THEIR FOOD AND THIS THEIR DRINK, HE WILL SAY..." (Portents of Doomsday, Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Rasul al-Barzanji, Pamuk Yayınları, Trans. Naim Erdoğan p. 214)
And the antichrist acts very quickly and dazzles them. He approaches them by speaking of religion, as if he were a spiritual guide. That even appears in the hadiths, "When the antichrist first appears, he will portray himself as a spiritual guide," says our Prophet (saas):
When he (the antichrist) appears ... EVERYONE WILL FOLLOW HIM AS IF HE WERE A GENUINE SPIRITUAL TEACHER, he will continue with the same activities when he comes to Kufa, IN SAYING THIS HE WILL CLAIM TO BE A PROPHET... Rational people who see this will then depart from him... HE WILL LATER CLAIM TO BE DIVINE... May God forbid, he will say, "I am God."... (Al-Tabarani narrated this from the Companion bin Mutamar.)
(Portents of Doomsday, Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Rasul al-Barzanji, Pamuk Press, Trans. Naim Erdoğan p. 212)
He (the antichrist) will first say: "I AM A PROPHET." Yet there will be no prophets after me. Then he will make a second claim and say, "I AM YOUR LORD." Yet you will not see your Lord until you die... (Sunan Ibn Majah, 4077)
The PKK says, "Let us perform the Friday prayer en masse in the Southeast." Look, "The antichrist will appear as a spiritual teacher when he first comes." "Then when people realize this, they will turn away from him," he says. "The antichrist will have a particular effect on rural dwellers, people of rural backgrounds, but people who are ignorant," he says. He says that the antichrist will "influence women and children faster." And when we look at the Southeast, we do see that these brothers are generally the antichrists targets. (January 17th, 2013; A9 TV)
With its matchless fossil pictures and undeniable scientific evidence, the Atlas of Creation deals a deadly blow to the theory of evolution. It is impossible for anyone who reads, sees or learns this information to be deceived by Darwinism and materialism. Materialism disappears wherever the Atlas of Creation is present.
This 54-to-37-million-year-old moonfish has remained unchanged for millions of years and is still living today. Fossils tell us, "Evolution never happened, Creation is true."
A federated state system is what certain foreign powers want in order to divide and redesign Turkey and thus rule it more easily.
ADNAN OKTAR: The "Kurdish problem" is an artificial cause. Some countries want to see the Southeast break away and imagine that they can thus redesign Turkey more easily. They want the Black Sea region and Central Anatolia to break away. Once it is divided it will be easier to rule. That is the issue: That and nothing else.
In that event, every mini-state they make will have its own little army. The Black Sea will have a separate army, the Southeast will have a separate army. Lots of little armies and little states. Russia could run them all over with its tanks in five minutes because each one would be an independent state. And lots of little states could not hold out like one large one.
A federated state, a miniature state. What they mean by federated state is independent states. They want to see lots of little states. They want Turkey to be divided into separate statelets. That is an idea held by Europe and others to impose their will on it. Small states are easy to manage because it is easy to stare them down; they are easily frightened. That is why they want them to be small. It would be much harder to manage them if they are large. They cannot do it, they cannot manage them.
For example, during the American invasion of Iraq they told Turkey, "Allow us to pass through your territory, let us use all that Turkey has and open your air space to us." Turkey refused. But had it been a small state, there would have been no need even to ask. "Here we are, hello," they would have said, and they would have walked straight through; no need even to ask. But when one is a great state, a large state, then people have to ask. (February 23rd, 2013; A9 TV)
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan will never allow the Southeast to come under the control of the PKK.
DİDEM ÜRER: Devlet Bahçeli has issued a new statement about the PKK. He suggests that there is a desire to bring down and fragment the Turkey that was acquired through great struggle. He went on to say, "A mentality that has no place in our existence and unity has decided to take Turkey away from us in a separatist flea market. What did the prime minister mean or intend to suggest by talking of politics and negotiations?"
ADNAN OKTAR: No. The prime minister will never do such a thing. He will never give away land and put the Southeast under the control of the PKK. That is not possible. The Turkish nation as a whole would never permit such a thing. Those beloved martyrs of ours surrendered their blessed souls to Almighty God for this country. It might be possible; there are 70 million of us, and if they martyr us all, then they can take wherever they choose, but that is the only way. It is out of the question. That is why I am quite relaxed. Nobody could even suggest or think of such an outrageous idea. Nobody can bring that about. The prime minister is a highly alert man. Tayyip Hodja is a great man. He is not someone to fall for such a thing. He loves the country and nation. So there can never ever be such a suggestion even, insha'Allah.